User talk:Charlieworton

Welcome!

Hello, Charlieworton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! John F. Lewis (talk) 12:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RFO BASIC

A tag has been placed on RFO BASIC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a manual move of a declined AfC and has been tagged as pending out of the AfC namespace. Instead of improving the article, the author created it in the main name space depsite being declined.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. John F. Lewis (talk) 12:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RFO Basic

The article RFO Basic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Sources are either not independent or do not mention RFO basic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 09:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Charlieworton. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 18:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

John F. Lewis (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RFO Basic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RFO Basic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RFO Basic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 07:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Charlieworton, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 22:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Lac-Mégantic derailment, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Taroaldo ✉ 05:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]