User talk:Charlie Golightly
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Charlie Golightly! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Regarding your changes to Adeney: Wikipedia goes with sources. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I reverted the others, please find consensus first, and go lightly. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Graham87 15:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Your edits fall so far outside the bounds of neutral point of view and plain common sense that I think a block is in order here. If you're being serious, see the essay Beware of the tigers; if you're not, which I strongly suspect, you are not welcome here. Graham87 15:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I edited the phrasing to GNL. How is gender-neutral language not a neutral point of view? My edits are less biased, less controversial, and more patently "neutral". Such is the basis of GNL-adjustments. My edits are fully within common sense. It's possible that there are simply that many articles that require a neutral point of view, adjusting from the biased language to GNL. Charlie Golightly (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I explained above that Wikipedia goes with the sources. If the sources use "he" for a subject, Wikipedia has to use "he" for facts referenced by those sources. Anything else is "original research", a no-no. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)