User talk:Charlie2145hj

Welcome!

Hello, Charlie2145hj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MX (✉ • ✎) 06:08, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: It Will be Chaos (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:It Will be Chaos may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 05:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charlie2145hj! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 05:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Charlie2145hj (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chetsford,

Thank you for reviewing my first article. I saw that you declined it based on copyright violation. I am not sure what specifically in the article was in violation?

Can you please tell me what it was specifically so I can remove it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:It_Will_be_Chaos --Charlie2145hj (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I noted that this line - "a comprehensive, yet intimate portrait of lives in transit" - is so close to this line - "part intimate portrait of lives in transit" [1] - as to violate WP:CLOP. Upon noting this, I declined the nomination without further review, ergo, there may be further copyright violation beyond this and I can't say this is a comprehensive list. Chetsford (talk) 02:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New section

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charlie2145hj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by user Bbb23 for an unspecified reason. I don't see any reason why my account was blocked. I had been making edits to learn how to use Wikipedia and just submitted my first draft of an article. Charlie2145hj (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time. You are blocked because a checkuser has determined that you are abusing multiple accounts. Please read the pertinent sections of the WP:GAB as they contain important information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charlie2145hj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for informing me of the reason; however, that couldn't be further from the truth. I don't know how or why my activity seemed suspicious in anyway. This is the only Wikipedia account I have and I haven't done anything abusive with it at all. I was informed my first article was declined due to an issue which I am trying to figure out, but that appears to be a normal part of learning to edit and write on Wiki. Can someone please review my status again? I believe I was blocked out of error. Charlie2145hj (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have reviewed the technical data, and there is indeed a very close overlap between this account and Film2pro. Combined with the It Will Be Chaos drafts, it seems very implausible that the two accounts would be unrelated. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Charlie2145hj - as this was the result of a Checkuser review, it might be that you are using the same IP address as Film2pro. Film2pro seems to have previously stated they are in some way employed by the film's production company or distributor and you both were singularly involved in submission of the It Will be Chaos draft. It might help to resolve this if you could clarify your relationship with the film and with the Film2pro account. If you're both working in the same office with the same objective that could be a reasonable explanation as to why you present the appearance as the same person controlling two accounts. And, if that's all it is, I'd imagine that could be a good reason for unblocking since COI disclosures seem to have been followed. (That said, of course, I don't know the specifics of the Checkuser results so there may be more to it than that.) Chetsford (talk) 02:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Itwillbechaosposter.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Itwillbechaosposter.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:It Will Be Chaos (2018 film) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:It Will Be Chaos (2018 film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:It Will Be Chaos (2018 film)

Hello, Charlie2145hj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "It Will Be Chaos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]