User talk:CharlesWycliffe

March 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abuse of multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 17:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CharlesWycliffe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the hell? I make two perfectly legitimate comments and I get blocked? Something is wrong here.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. —DoRD (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think a Checkuser check might be in order here, unless you wish me not to ask for one? Rodhull andemu 18:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get the IP blocked? This is getting tedious. raseaC^{talk to me} 18:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed a request to a CU for a second opinion. If this is Harvey Carter, he uses dynamic IP addresses. Rodhull andemu 18:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is the case, unfortunately the IP range is far too large to make an effective rangeblock. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well. Maybe he'll get bored. Or a life. raseaC^{talk to me} 23:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CharlesWycliffe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Harvey Carter.

Decline reason:

That's funny, because checkuser says you are. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nice to know one's instinct remains as sharp as it needs to be. Next sock, right along here, please!!! Rodhull andemu 00:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]