User talk:CharlesWCII

Welcome

Hello Chuck, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you have added the Society for Neuroscience userbox to your page, and I just want to tell you to feel free to contact me if you have any questions at all about editing here. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Micropsia

It is still a little narrow in scope to meet GA criteria. See Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Micropsia/1 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google books has some great resources to improve the article [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Psych haus

Please do not remove the speedy delete tag. If you are going to work on the article, create it in a subpage and bring it to mainspace when you are finished or add a "hang on" template with some content. It would help if you could comment on your aims on the article's talk page. Thanks Tiderolls 01:28, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created to Psych Haus. CharlesWCII^talk 01:41, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Psych Haus

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Psych Haus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reaganomics (Psych Haus album)

The article Reaganomics (Psych Haus album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable third party sources indicating notability of this EP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vejvančický (talk) 06:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Psych haus

A tag has been placed on Psych haus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 15:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Micropsia.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Micropsia.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]