User talk:Charles669

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Charles669 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 21:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Show preview button

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Peter Schonemann, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Chaser - T 22:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charles669 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for no apparent reason. It says vandalism, but I have not idea why this reason has been cited.

Decline reason:

This account did vandalise User talk:Edgar181, so it stays blocked. See also here. — Sandstein 21:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Look at your contributions. It's because of your edits to User talk:Edgar181. What was the point of these? Sandstein 21:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do that --Charles669 21:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may have been my brother who vandalized Edgar's page. Still, I do not see how an indefinite block is within reason. I have contributed very positively to Wikipedia in the short time that I have been an editor. I find it a matter of shame that random admins have authority to imposed blocks on constructive contributors. Perhaps you should investigate Edgar's contributions (?), because this is completely ridiculous. Who are you people??? --Charles669 21:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]