User talk:Char1ene16

Adding content to Violet Chachki

Hi, I see you've tried to add information about Violet's drag daughter to her article twice. I had to revert your edit both times because you did not include a reliable source inside reference tags (<ref></ref>) at the end of the sentence. We can't put any information in a Wikipedia article without sourcing it. Please feel free to add the information back if you can do so with a citation. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions! Armadillopteryx^talk 15:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the talk page of your original account, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 09:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Char1ene16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong. JBW is abusing their power Char1ene16 (talk) 10:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Char1ene16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been falsely accused of sock puppeting. The reason it seems like it is because I have been using different IP addresses. Char1ene16 (talk) 12:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, that does not sufficiently explain why you were blocked for block evasion. I do not believe you have no other accounts. Yamla (talk) 13:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There were several things which made me think you were evading blocks, but having read your unblock request at UTRS I have decided it is not absolutely certain, so I will unblock you. However, a word of advice. You are more likely to find that other editors will listen to you and take notice of what you say if you don't accuse them of "picking on you", "abusing power", and so on. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 11:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Char1ene16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been falsely accused of sock puppeting, blocked from editing and when I tried to rightfully oppose my unfair ban, one of the “admins” has told me that they don’t believe I have 1 account. The truth is I only have 1 account and this account is that account. Some of you guys are abusing your power. If you administrators won’t believe me, then how am I supposed to prove myself? Char1ene16 (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you still decline to address the questions asked, I am declining your request and removing talk page access. That will leave you with WP:UTRS to request unblock- but in order to succeed there, you will need to specifically address why we think you are a sockpuppet if you aren't, and discuss any and all other accounts you have used. 331dot (talk) 15:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may use WP:UTRS to request unblock, when you do you need to respond to the comments above. I realize they are not in the form of a question, but you will need to address them to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 19:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the link above, "UTRS" stands for Unblock Ticket Request System. It is the method by which blocked editors can request an unblock if their talk page access has been removed. Emailing individual administrators and accusing them of "outrageous" behaviour is not the way to request an unblock. I have removed your email access for now, but if you submit an unblock request via UTRS and it is accepted then your email access will be restored. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:, I'm taking a look at Char1ene16's UTRS appeal but I'm not sure who they're meant to be a sock of? -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Char1ene16/sandbox

User:Char1ene16/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Char1ene16/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Char1ene16/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 18:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]