User talk:Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace

Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan

Hello. I have moved your article to draft space in the meantime at Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan. At present it is quite promotional and would have been eligible for a G11 deletion. You can improve the article in the draft space and click on submit when you feel it is ready. Please also read WP:N for more about what makes something notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Lemongirl1942 for your assistance. I have now tried to make this less promotional with language changes and additional references. I hope you think it is better now. Also if not do you have other advice for me to make it more wiki worthy? Thanks Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace (talk) 07:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sushma Rajgopalan (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This belongs at his own personal website because this is exactly what it is, it's his own personal advertised career and similar; none of it is acceptable in our policies simply because it's not suitable, regardless of anything or anyone. We are not Facebook.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sushma Rajgopalan

Hello, Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sushma Rajgopalan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. IM3847 (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]