User talk:Changi001

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aeroflot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Planespotters is not a reliable source. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael's Transportation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael's Transportation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 17:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Bump to level 3. Multiple articles Meters (talk) 18:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fremont Union High School District. Stop adding unsourced content. We don't care if you claim that you were told by someone in the schoolboard. Meters (talk) 07:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And no, a personal webpage, as you attempted to use on Cupertino Union School District, is not a reliable source either. Meters (talk)`

I doubt that that detailed information on current and former bus fleets is is worth mentioning in the articles, but it's certainly not going in just because you claim to have personal information. We don't know who you are, and we don't care. Wikipedia content must be verifiable by readers. That means that unsourced information is not acceptable. We need reliable independent sources that can be verified by readers. What a school board member told you is not acceptable, and neither is someone's person web site. And it's a really bad idea to publish your email in an edit summary. Meters (talk) 08:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will provide screenshots and sources from the board of FUHSD. What i said is true. Changi001 (talk) 17:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a personal webpage you moron! Can you stop going against me for everything! School districts need transportation info because just like how there are aviation enthusiasts, there are school bus enthusiasts too. Changi001 (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Changi001, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 00:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am in agreement with Meters. There are several Wikipedia policies/guidelines that cover this:

Wikipedia is not a place to collect miscellaneous information.
Content should not be given undue weight. Not every bit of minutiae about a university should be included in the article. We don't, for example, list every professor who instructs at a university (which I would argue is more useful information than the specific make-up of their transit fleet).
Wikipedia generally does not accept self-published sources.

Please do not re-add this information. It is not appropriate within the context of an encyclopedia article. --Chris (talk) 01:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Chris (talk) 00:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Krithi Shetty, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:IMDB is not a reliable source. Ab207 (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Air India fleet. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Arnav Bhate (talk) 05:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it is not incorrect. Air India does not want to retire their 777-200LR anymore. Changi001 (talk) 14:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then WP:PROVEIT. Arnav Bhate (talk) 04:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Air India have sold their 777-200LRs to an Irish based leasing company and have leased them back for a short period according to a reputable aviation insider. AlphaBravo178 (talk) 07:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Air india fleet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You crossing your limits this is last and final warning to you NikhilW10 (talk) 04:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Air India fleet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NikhilW10 (talk) 03:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deepika Pilli moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Deepika Pilli. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and undersourced, lacking sufficient sourced information to comprise an even brief biography, a great deal more information is required. Suggest resumbission through the AfC process.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to KL University. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Air India fleet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ZLEA _T\^C 03:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deepika Pilli

Hello, Changi001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deepika Pilli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Deepika Pilli

Hello, Changi001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Deepika Pilli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Changi001. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 04:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]