User talk:ChandraSH

Image copyright problem with Image:Withsons.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Withsons.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nali.JPG listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Nali.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. _JD^talk 20:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://banglapedia.search.com.bd/HT/I_0116.htm. As a copyright violation, Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Islamic Foundation, Bangladesh.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. tomst | talk 07:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dighapatia Rajbari and Dighapatia

Likewise, the articles Dighapatia and Dighapatia Rajbari appear to be copied from Banglapedia, which is copyright. Please see the advice above in respect of these articles. Fayenatic london (talk) 13:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Palace.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palace.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Singranatore family

The article Singranatore family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no source or citation regarding the mentioned family. Most probably it is a hoax and article is full of information with history of Zamindari system which has no need here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Jalaluddin Mirza

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]