User talk:Chandana v

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/V ChandanaHarika, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 13:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of V ChandanaHarika (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry for what had happend but I'm doing this editing work out of my internship process. For all the inconvenience I'm really sorry for that! Thank you. Chandana v (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chandana v (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked for "sockpuppetry" and I would like to clarify the sock puppet report. I am obviously User:V ChandanaHarika as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/V ChandanaHarika/Archive concluded, but I created this new account "Chandana v" because I forgot password of "V ChandanaHarika". I used similar usernames because I had no intention of deceiving others. I can verify that I am not violating the policy on multiple accounts and I am ready to stick to this one account. As for the rest of the issues, I will be editing with a lot more care.

Decline reason:

I can't see where you declared this, prior to editing. Also, your edits across both accounts have been totally inappropriate, so even if WP:SOCK is resolved, I see no benefit to lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notify User:GeneralNotability of unblock appeal. Chandana v (talk) 04:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]