User talk:Chanbara

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Chanbara, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 14:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you make an article for Shinobi no Mono?

Or possibly Kamui too. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised there isn't one already for Shinobi no Mono. Anyway, yeah I should be able to start one for it. I'll gather up some info (including some on the Japanese Wikipedia page) and go from there. If it goes well, I'll look at creating one for Kamui after that. --Chanbara (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shinobi no Mono.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 03:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi, I'm just letting you know that most of the sources on the Shinobi no Mono entry you've created cannot be used. I'll detail why:

[1] This entry is just a database entry among many others. It looks like it's about the equivalent of an IMDb listing. It might be usable as a trivial source, but for the most part it just shows that the films existed, not that they were notable.
[2] This is a listing to the Anime Eigo purchase page. This cannot be a reliable or even really a trivial source. Links to product pages are to be avoided. It does give the links to two reviews, but unfortunately neither seem to be from sites that would be considered reliable or notable.
[3] This looks to be a fan site and unless it's a site that's been quoted in reliable sources (books, notable people, etc), you can't really use fan sites.
[4] This review site doesn't appear to be reliable or notable enough to count as a reliable source, unfortunately.
[5] Linking to the Japanese Wikipedia article doesn't really help give notability in this instance, unfortunately.
[6] This one I'm sort of unfamiliar with, but depending on where the article originally was posted it might be usable. If it was independently published by a notable person and/or in a reliable journal/publication, then it can be used. Otherwise it's pretty much the equivalent of a blog or review site in that we can only use them if they've been published by reliable sources or if the person writing the article is so notable that they're considered to be an authority in the subject. (IE, that they've been quoted in multiple books, etc.)
[7] This looks like it's the publisher's page, which would be seen as a primary source. It might be usable as a trivial source, but anything put out by the publisher, author (I know he's long dead, but just listing it as an example), or anyone involved in the production of the books or films would be seen as a primary source.
[8] This is just a World Cat listing. It just proves that the books exist and doesn't really count as a reliable or even trivial source.

HOWEVER, since the books have been adapted into several different movies as well as a TV show, it's clearly notable per WP:NBOOK. I just wanted to let you know why I'll be deleting all of the sources from the article even though I approved it to the wiki. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Fixed it! It should redirect to the actual page now! That was my first attempt actually doing anything with redirects, so I hope it was done right!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Big Four (tennis) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Reliability-Clay-Career-List.aspx|title=FedEx ATP Reliability Index|accessdate=1 April 2012}}</ref>) Nadal has a winning record on outdoor hard courts (7–2) and clay (13–2), while Federer leads on
Djokovic to win US Open"] ABC Grandstand Sport – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)]</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Fisher|first=Stewart|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/home-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ninja Assassin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chanbara. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chanbara. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions NotYourFathersOldsmobile (talk) 04:11, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chanbara. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yagyū Jūbei Mitsuyoshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Enter the Ninja, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Enter the Ninja. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of this information is going against the Manual of Style? You are removing VALID information that is all properly sourced (have many more examples in 1980s martial arts magazines). Also, the term "sequels" is usually associated with films that feature the same characters, which this trilogy does not. It is an anthology series and a TRILOGY (referred as such on vintage posters in 1984 upon the release of the final film in the trilogy: https://www.instagram.com/p/BtEb2N3A7GP/)Chanbara (talk) 14:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The main issue is you are introducing information into the lead with sources which belongs in the prose. Per MOS:LEADCITE, you generally do not include citations in the lead unless its controversial material. This information belongs in the prose, which I have added and you have removed. Its not that it wasn't sourced, its just in the wrong section, and you have continuously added it there. I have dug up information to balance it out and add it to the prose which you have removed, (which I don't think you did to be a vandal, just maybe you were not aware of the standards). I am okay with them not being called sequels, but as these films are relatively obscure nowadays, I would not state its a Cannon series (which is not mentioned in any source you have dug up, and has no real meaning to an average reader.) I'm not against stating trilogy, but outside one box set, there does not seem to be a title for it. I'd suggest re-writing that. So feel free to re-phrase them as not being sequels, but I would avoid formatting the lead with sources and find ways to include this info in the prose and to make sure your text actually is fully backed up by the sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:53, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added sources after you removed this information because they had no sources to begin with. These 3 films have been referred to as a trilogy and specifically as "The Ninja Trilogy" since the mid 1980s. Eureka Video did not come up the term, they simply used what has been well known for 30+ years and referred to as such many times (magazines, publicity, etc...). The vintage video store poster for the VHS release of Ninja III: The Domination in 1984 is a perfect example as they state "The TRILOGY is now complete". You are also incorrect about these not being a Cannon series. The Cannon Group Inc. produced all 3 films. The copyright on all 3 film prints is Cannon Films, Inc. and the Cannon Group Presents company logo begins each film. Yoram Globus and Menahem Golan (of Golan-Globus Productions) owned and operated Cannon Films/The Cannon Group. The 3 films are CANNON films. Ignoring this or stating or claiming otherwise is simply untrue.Chanbara (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Movie Database

Quick question, how is the Japanese Movie Database sourced? How do they gather their information? Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JMDB has information sourced from Kinema Junpo and other Japanese film publications and newspapers, as well as information provided from the studios. Other good resources for Japanese films are https://www.japanese-cinema-db.jp/ and http://db.eiren.org/ Chanbara (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Japanese films of 1960, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Japanese films of 1967, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroshi Ikeda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of vampire films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Murphy, David Price and Maria Schneider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of vampire films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michelle Johnson, Paul Hoffman and Naoko Watanabe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raven (1992 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Levine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonny Chiba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ninja television programs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ninja television programs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ninja television programs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CUPIDICAE💕 15:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sonny Chiba

The please provide a source for this, because I could not find anything when I was searching. The Hong Kong Movie DataBase isn't user-generated, it has an editorial team that reviews and approves everything. I provided a source, you have not. Xia ^{talk to me} 11:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've used HKMDB in the past and have had all references removed. Anyway, the "Sonny" name is from the crappy English Dubbed version. The character's true name in the original Japanese version is as I indicated. Plenty of sources for it: https://eigadb.com/cinema/staff?id=18628, https://eiga.com/movie/36221/, https://moviewalker.jp/mv18449/, etc... so take your pick.Chanbara (talk) 13:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of vampire films for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of vampire films, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vampire films until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]