User talk:ChanTheManWithAPlan

Image copyright problem with Image:KelisPostcardFront.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KelisPostcardFront.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 14:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Connections to Jason Gastrich

Welcome! Just so you know you commented with your fifth ever into a hotly debated issue surrounding the use of 10 new users who are suspcted of being sock puppets. It would benefit you to mention how you came across this issue and use your fifth edit ever to post on my talk. Especially, since it has been revealed that a banned user, User:Jason Gastrich, has been purposely recruiting people to vote keep a list of accredited schools.

Also since your fifth ever edit and first edit and only edit in a week relates to Jason Gastrich and his program to recuit "keep" these lists, you should reveal any possible relationship you have with him. Also I am curious why you have an interest in this. Again, welcome. Arbusto 21:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Chan! Just so you know, Arbusto is bold-faced lying. He has no proof that Jason Gastrich even posts on Wikipedia any more. There isn't even an outstanding accusation from someone that they received a message from Jason telling them to vote. Arbusto is a liar, so don't feel that you even need to reply to him (or her, I don't know which gender an "Arbustoo" is). If I were you, I'd ignore him altogether until he gets his act together and stops lying and trying to deceive. --BryanW4C 21:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First and only edit by BryanW4C (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Also in case people want to see it again[1], that is proof Jason is still involved with POV pushing on wikipedia despite his ban. Arbusto 21:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chan, I'm just trying to figure out why you ignored such a basic question and have continued to edit other pages? Arbusto 21:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. Hayson saying he doesn't know who emailed him is proof? Proof that you're a liar. Don't expect a response from someone that you lie to and try to deceive. You certainly don't deserve one. --BryanW4C 22:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who runs the website in question, "Dr." "new" user? Arbusto 22:52, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps some explanation is needed...

I can tell you who Jason Gastrich character is, if you really want to know. I think you deserve an answer, seeing as how you are a newbie who has been bitten by having your talk page turned into a debate club with little explanation. Just drop me a line on my talkpage if you need an explanation about what is going on—I just don't have any time at the moment to explain everything on your talkpage.--The i kiroid (talk parler hablar paroli 说話し parlar) 01:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The Black Eyed Peas, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 15:09, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Video_pumpit.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Video_pumpit.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]