User talk:Chambers109

Attempts to create rational explanations for John Major Jenkins's theories, which are not aupported by reliable sources, are not appreciated. His theories are notable, but they appear irrational and are noted as such by reliable sources. If you want to describe how they might be rational, please only use reliable sources. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JulesElise for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Yworo (talk) 14:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I have a question for you on the case page I'd like you to answer please. Yworo (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2012 phenomenon. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yworo (talk) 16:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please read the policy. Partial reverts count as reverts for the purposes of 3RR, so you've now broken the prohibition. I've reported you here. Yworo (talk) 18:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)