User talk:Chakalarov

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vlado Chernozemski has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vlado Chernozemski was changed by Chakalarov (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871239 on 2016-04-08T05:07:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chakalarov, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chakalarov! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Identifying reliable sources in history

Hi, Chekalarov, Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history). When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources. However, some scholarly material may be outdated, in competition with alternative theories, or controversial within the relevant field. Try to cite current scholarly consensus when available, recognizing that this is often absent. Reliable non-academic sources may also be used in articles about scholarly issues, particularly material from high-quality mainstream publications. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]