User talk:Chairhandlers

He stilled the rising tumult.

No title

Halloween special actually counts as two episodes, after the opening credits there is part one written by .. and part two written by... That actually means two episodes, although they aired as one.

Supernatural's Season 12 episodes

Hi, I don't really know another way to talk to you, so I'm doing it here. Sorry if it's not appropriated. But, season 12 of supernatural is 23 episodes, not 22. Jim Michael's, one of the co-executive producers of the show, confirms it on his twitter bio.

Regards! Andrebodart (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrebodart, no problem at all, buddy... I see Michaels wrote his bio with the episodes number for season 12 but it's not enough to put the information into the article. Unfortunately, it is not a valid source as no reliable source has confirmed this information. I totally get your point but once you got a reliable source, you're free to change the page. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 18:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural season 12 revert

I have to dispute your reverting my edit, changing "who" back to "whom". Citing a site called Grammerly...

[1]

...the rule of thumb is to use the word that most closely matches what the appropriate pronoun would be. For "whom" to work, the sentence would need to be able to be: "Mary Winchester, her has been resurrected and convinces Mary of his identity before filling her in on what she missed in the 33 years following her murder." Clearly it would be "she", so clearly it should be "who". Morfusmax (talk) 15:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

13 Reasons Why plot summary edits

Hi,

Would you mind explaining how you came to the conclusion that my edits to the plot summaries for 13 Reasons Why weren't better than the previous version?

I considered my edits quite minor and only to improve the clarity / accuracy of the descriptions. If you disagree, how / why?

My only thought is that maybe those summaries are pulled from an official source somewhere, and that's why they were reverted.

Thanks for any clarity you can provide.

Please reply here. — 23:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Episode title

Please refer to this discussion regarding my removal of the title. Seems HBO is going back and forth between two titles, so I figured it best to leave it as TBA for now. Calibrador (talk) 11:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template sizes

Hi User:Chairhandlers, can you please resize the episode template columns for the pilot and series' of People Just Do Nothing? or tell me how to do it please? Thanks.--Theo Mandela (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done mate. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 23:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers mate, really appreciate it. 👍--Theo Mandela (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaz Bono on "Cult"

Before it gets ugly, here is yet another album that withholds his cast portrait > https://twitter.com/ahsnews_feed/status/902964366714261508 As you can see, his name is stated on a name tag, presumably given out by The Butchery on Main restaurant. Obviously, it's official being released with other cast portraits. Hope you take your time to look and understand how silly it is to start a revert war. Changeisgame (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

American Horror Story: Cult‎

First you deleted the information saying that it was a copy and paste. Then a mysterious ip appears, eliminating the content saying that everything is false. Then you re-remove the content saying that it is a description of the character. Can you explain what this is about?. Your arguments seem to me totally incoherent, I know what it is to describe a character and and I also know what a brief description of an episode of any series is.--Philip J Fry : Talk 14:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like you to please indicate some other standard of the manual of style with respect to the articles of seasons, if possible, thank you.--Philip J Fry : Talk 14:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Skins episodes templates

Hi User:Chairhandlers, any chance you can get episode templates for Skins episodes and Character Video Diaries with column sizes please? Cheers.--Theo Mandela (talk) 01:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Chairhandlers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Columbine High School massacre in popular culture have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. John from Idegon (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chairhandlers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walking Dead

Hi. Re this: [2] . Please could you show me which episode includes cited material showing "Kerry Cahill as Dianne, one of Ezekiel's top soldiers and a skilled archer.", to take just one example. WP:BLP demands strong sourcing, not weak. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Kerry Cahill has appeared as Dianne in several episodes in season 8 so far, such as "Mercy", "The Damned", "Monsters", and "The King, the Widow, and Rick". - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 14:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't respond to my point. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 08:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Supergirl (TV series)

What was the purpose of this edit to the website data at Supergirl (TV series)? It was unnecessary because the infobox automatically pulls the website url from wikidata if it's available. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

''[[User:Chairhandlers|<font color="4153A0" face="Century Gothic" size="2">- '''Chairhandlers'''</font>]]'' <sup>'''''([[User Talk:Chairhandlers|<span style="color: #111111; background: #fff;">Talk to Me!</span>]])'''''</sup>

: - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)}

to

[[User:Chairhandlers|<i style="color: #4153A0; font-family: Century Gothic; font-size: small">- '''Chairhandlers'''</i>]] <sup>'''([[User Talk:Chairhandlers|<i style="color: #111111; background: #fff;">Talk to Me!</i>]])'''</sup>

: - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)}

—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 22:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry for the delay. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 23:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 11:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I've added it to my userbox. Thanks! - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 13:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Red link

Hi! I saw you give the same rationale for removing a link to a non-existing article twice. Is there a rule on this Wikipedia that prohibits adding red links? On the Dutch Wikipedia, they are allowed and seen as an invitation of sorts for adding a new article. Richard 16:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Happy birthday – one day late is not a problem, I hope? Richard 16:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the compliment! About the red link, you're totally right. There are no rules on Wikipedia prohibiting them so we can leave them as an invitation for adding an article... To be honest it hasn't crossed my mind, that's why I've been removing them. Anyway, I've undone my edit and re-added them back. Cheers! - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 21:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Richard 09:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to warn, please use the correct warning template.

Regarding This warning, if you DO choose to warn someone, don't warn them with the "vandalism" template unless it is clear they are trying to harm wikipedia. In this case the template for adding unsourced content is more appropriate. See WP:UWT for a full list of warning templates. Better yet would be to simply tell someone exactly what they are doing wrong, like I am doing right now. But either way, be deliberately detailed and explain exactly what someone is doing wrong, instead of just calling it all "vandalism". Thanks! --Jayron 32 17:36, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scandal Season 7

You undid my edit on the Scandal season 7 page and I was wondering why. The source I cited for the series finale title has since had the video in which the title is mentioned deleted, so I can see how that's not valid anymore. However, there is a source for Darby directing episode 15. There is also a separate source providing the title and writers for her episode without the episode number, yet when I combine both sources into adding the info about episode 15, it's wrong? Tooniee (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! We don't know who directs episode 17. If we had a director for this episode (that not being Darby Stanchfield), we could confirm for sure that the episode titled as "The Noise" is episode 15 since Darby Stanchfield directs this episode according to the source. However, once we don't have a director for episode 17, we can't assume that the source is about episode 15. I hope you understand what I'm trying to explain here. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 19:28, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Riverdale' Needs To Get Separate Season Pages

Riverdale definitely needs separate season pages. This should've happened a long time ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norby Lala (talk • contribs) 21:04, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Try discussing this on the show's talk page. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 17:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Momoa

(I watch the page for updates on information on the series) Where exactly is he credited for the second season?💵Money💵emoji💵^Talk 14:57, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Momoa is credited as "also starring" at the end of the cast list in the end credits. You can see on the talk page a section where this is mentioned. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 16:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jadis/Anne

Hi there. I'm a bit confused by your edit here, given you just recently deleted The Governor's real name from the article here. Per WP:TVCHARACTER, "All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source". Her common name is arguably Jadis; it's how she is referred to in episode summaries; her Wikipeida article is Jadis (The Walking Dead) and AMC credits her as Jadis. At the very least, I suggest removing the note, since it comes off fairly aggressive by stating "Changing it will be reverted!". Thanks. Drovethrughosts (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest you're right. Actually it's kind of funny comparing my edits about Jadis/The Governor, they don't make sense. Anyway I've undone my edit on Jadis' name. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 17:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the changes! Have a good day! Drovethrughosts (talk) 20:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reverting my edit

you reverted my edit on the 100 characters list. why? i contributed a lot, making it substantially better, and added that isaiah washington was still being credited as a series regular. yet you reverted it. why? Hurricane Seth (talk) 04:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You added an old source that stated he would only make an appearance, that's why I reverted your edit. However, I have now updated the source to a new one that proves he will indeed be a main cast member in the season. Cheers! - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 14:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Money Heist

I will ask you to participate in the discussion of the article, as I do not intend to accept your editions. Bearing in mind that you yourself contradict what you say. Here you are asking for sources, and here they replenish the titles of the episodes without providing a source of where you got them.--Philip J Fry t c 11:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I was very upset, not finding the original titles of the episode on the wikipedia page of money heist anymore... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_Heist as I understood the edition history, it was Philip J Fry, who lately deleted all the titles, commenting with: "On the official page of Antena 3 there are no such titles" what about the official imdb page? https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6468322/episodes?season=1&ref_=tt_eps_sn_1 sorry, but i don't have a wikipedia account... 92.200.58.64 (talk) 21:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brian d'Arcy James

Before I proceed to revert your edit in 13 Reasons Why, please explain why you think Brian d'Arcy James should not be credited as a series regular like the rest. He is credited as a regular in the episodes he appears in starting from the fourth episode of the second season. He is credited before Derek Luke. Thank you. Nyanchoka : talk 2 me 15:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I have reverted my edit myself. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 22:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A.L.I.E. vs ALIE

Based on this edit it appears that MOS:ABBR is being used to justify removing the periods. However, I agree with you as the name was clearly shown as "A.L.I.E." in the episodes. If he's going to claim that common nouns like "boat people" and "mountain men" are proper nouns he needs to be consistent. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Funeral

Hi. Repeating this from the talk page of the article itself since I don't know if you'll be seeing it there. I don't want to start an edit war, but given your history of undoing my edits without checking the explanation/proof I provided, I wanted to make sure you actually saw the tweet and didn't just remove the info because it happens to be an unofficial account. How is a tweet including a picture of the script for the premiere of HTGAWM season 5 an unreliable source? It's from an Instagram story from the series creator himself, but as you might know an Instagram story disappears after 24 hours so I can't link to it. I have a screenshot I can post here, but I'm not sure I'm allowed. Just because there is no way to link to it without going through a secondary source, doesn't mean that the screenshot itself is unreliable. At least that is how I see it, but maybe Instagram stories are against the rules. Tooniee (talk) 19:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have responded to your section at the talk page. Honestly, I really wish we could just add the info to the article because it seems to be authentic after all; however, the Twitter account used for it is indeed an unreliable one and we have to follow Wikipedia rules regarding unreliable sources. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 21:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template on American Horror Story links

On the template that you've recently put on AHS season articles, why do you think the template is better than normal wikilinks? Ted Edwards 00:19, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. These templates have been used in the articles for a long time and were unexplainedly removed. They're organized which makes the pages more understandable and easier to edit since they're simple and were made specially for the series' characters. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 00:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, they are currently being used for the eighth season page. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 00:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But in my edit summary for the revert on Asylum, I said "editors are more likely to understand [wikilinks]" than the template, especially if they aren't aware with the nature of AHS. I mean, it isn't exactly hard to use a wikilink. Thanks for your quick reply btw. Ted Edwards 00:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I changed the templates to wikilinks as when I was viewing the page the templates weren't working on multiple pages and made the cast list difficult to navigate because of this. Not only this, on the pages that were using the templates some didnt link to the appropriate character and others included a redirect. I didn't remove them without explanation. And as user TedEdwards said editors and those less experienced in editing may find wiki links easier to edit than templates. Thanks. Brocicle (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Report user

Can you please tell me where I can report a user. TheKerberos01 (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @TheKerberos01: If you're looking for administerial action go to WP:AN/Incidents, and then in the list there, find the relevant notice board to report the user e.g. if they are edit warring, go to WP:AN3RR. However, assuming this is about CarolSaurio, I would first take to the talk the talk page, pinging the user (insert {{ping|CarolSaurio}}) and discuss your edits. You are both edit warring, and you need to stop using exclamation points to try to get them to do what you want them to do, it doesn't work, and you need to understand that you do not own the article, what you say does not necessarily go and what you say is not necessarily "right". Also, your last edit summary If you do not stop, I'll get back to you! could be seen as threatening and uncivil. Ted Edwards 00:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks, I'll take your advice too. And yes, it's about the user CarolSaurio. TheKerberos01 (talk) 09:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TWD

I know Archimaterials do not really count as gigs, but would you agree that you take it into the table anyway with the main characters?
You can write that they are just archival materials, or do you think it unnecessary?

Well, maybe I should start this topic on the talk page, but first I want to hear your opinion. TheKerberos01 (talk) 20:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Honestly I don't see why this would be necessary or relevant... But I do think that you should discuss this on the talk page so you can get others' opinion. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 19:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Money Heist

Hi. Episodes consisting of the same season, that are broken into parts, like in Breaking Bad (season 5) are done this way. Also for foreign language titles, the English title is in its own column: Gomorrah (TV series), Suburra: Blood on Rome etc. And it is completely necessary - the season was broken into two parts - info that is prudent - it was not a continuous season. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 20:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note on AHS Apocalypse

In your most recent edit to this page, you added the note Do not add a year here until it is confirmed in the season itself!. Now, I've only seen the first episode, but that episode is set over 18 months. So I'm wondering if it was best to leave this sentence without a year at all due to a potential ambiguity, even if it is confirmed in the season, and keep it as "near future" regardless. Ted Edwards 15:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 15:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a note saying Please do not add a year, as this season takes over a long period of time, to make sure no one adds a year. Ted Edwards 16:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AHS Apocalypse: Cast and characters

Regarding the Recurring and guest section: What specifically do you mean by "per appearance order". Is it meant to be the order in which the cast appeared on-screen during an episode-by-episode basis? Because that is currently not the case. I don't mean to offend, I would just like to get a clearer understanding. (DantesWeb (talk) 23:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, that's right. They should be listed like this until we have a basis of who is recurring and who is a guest star so we can split them into sections. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 23:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Circuit breaker: recurring

Rather silly that we're needing to have a discussion about what the word "recurring" means -- but let's have that discussion if it means we avoid continuing to edit war. To recur: to happen many times or to happen again (Cambridge), to occur again after an interval : occur time after time (Merriam-Webster).

In HTGAWM, Cicely Tyson appeared as her respective character in season 2 and season 4 in a recurring capacity; she appeared in not one episode – but she made another appearance in those said seasons.

So, why are you edit warring without having even justified your reasoning? the onus is on you to explain why you're going against the definition of recurring and seemingly making up your own? I've asked that you discuss this various times, so here's hoping you'll finally shed some light. Regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This has never been about the literal meaning/definition of the word "recurring". I'm not "making up" my own rules as I'm only following Wikipedia rules, which should necessarily be followed. Have you ever read MOS:TVCAST? It contains details about the definition of "recurring" on Wikipedia; 2 appearances within a season doesn't necessarily counts as a recurring capacity, it's still a guest capacity, as I've been saying this whole time. Also, I'm reverting the article again, this time mentioning MOS:TVCAST. Cheers. - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 13:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chairhandlers. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Arrow (season 7)#Question about character links

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Arrow (season 7)#Question about character links. — Lbtocth^talk 11:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chilling Adventures of Sabrina

Hey! In multiple interviews, Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa and the cast of Sabrina are describing 'Part 1' and 'Part 2' as the first and second parts of Season 1, so Part 2 wouldn't be considered a second season, so I was wondering if we could change the format. (one of the interviews: https://www.etonline.com/chilling-adventures-of-sabrina-cast-reveals-their-dream-riverdale-crossover-ideas-exclusive-115777); also, shouldn't "A Midwinter's Tale" be considered the 11th episode of Season 1 as that is the way it is listed on Netflix? Thank you for your time. =D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lady Rapunzzle (talk • contribs) 04:55, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You should start a discussion about it on the series' talk page. Cheers! - Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 12:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update to scripts by AlexTheWhovian/Alex 21

Hello! This is a generic message created and copied to all editors using scripts that I have created. As I have recently changed my username from "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21", any scripts that I have created that are listed at your common.js page may, at the moment, no longer be working. To fix this, simply update all occurrences of "User:AlexTheWhovian" to "User:Alex 21"; see here for an example. All the best! -- /Alex/₂₁ 11:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Khary Payton Season 7

Before the edit war exhales even further, I have now reversed the processing and now started a discussion, so we can clarify there, if necessary, with others. --TheKerberos01 21:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

got seasons

you undid my revisions because they were unexplained, but i mean if you look at the pages right now there's all that left white space so its pretty obvious why i made the changes. i dont really understand why you feel that space should be there. --SacredDragonX (talk) 04:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are no white spaces in none of the articles.- Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 14:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

really? for me it looks like this: https://imgur.com/a/CgKIaCv my changes fix this for me. --SacredDragonX (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chairhandlers: gentle reminder that you haven't responded to me. --SacredDragonX (talk) 01:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the pattern template for characters sections in season articles. Unfortunately it can't fit all screens perfectly. Sorry.- Chairhandlers ^{(Talk to Me!)} 19:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

im aware, but that doesnt mean that the 80% is set in stone, does it? if i change it, it can fit other screens along with yours. so i don't know what the problem is. --SacredDragonX (talk) 00:22, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]