User talk:Chahtaohoyo
Welcome!
[edit]
|
April 2014
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma has been reverted.
Your edit here to Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/JoyFranklinPhotography) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Chahtaohoyo, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Chahtaohoyo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Washington Redskins
[edit]I've opened a discussion per bold, revert, discuss on Talk:Washington Redskins regarding your bold edits. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Jacqueline Keeler for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacqueline Keeler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Keeler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Summer Wesley, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Summer Wesley
[edit]Hello Chahtaohoyo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Summer Wesley".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Summer Wesley}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 16:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)