User talk:Chadbryant/Archive2005

Note For Admins

Comments from any sock being operated by multiple alt.usenet.kooks award winner Alex "Dink" Cain and his endless parade of pedantic socks are still unwanted here. See User_talk:Mel_Etitis/Chadbryant_vandals for more details. - Chadbryant 18:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serious vandalism

Why did you blank the template of my Welcome message, thus removing it from the page of every new user that I'd welcomed? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:07, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If I actually did that, I'm sorry. - Chadbryant 13:54, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Well you're the second person who's done it, and though the first person didn't respond when I pointed it out, your response makes me think that there's some sort of glitch in the system. Your deletion of my welcome message (which I'd inadvertently applied as a template instead of using 'subst') blanked the original. I still don't know how, but my apologies for accusing you. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:03, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No problem. As you can probably tell, I've had to deal with an abusive user posting garbage on my profile & talk pages - I'm not being destructive. - Chadbryant 14:15, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I've just reverted some of his vandalism on your page. I suggest that you report him to an admin, and ask for assistance; this sort of behaviour is unacceptable. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης)

I've reported him - it seems he's changed accounts and is now User:DickNWitham. - Chadbryant 20:45, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

More vandals

Your userpages seems to attract a lot of vandals. We're blocking them as they come, but if you'd like it protected, just ask. You wouldn't be able to edit it yourself, but you don't seem to anyway. 131.211.210.12 12:43, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Locking my page would be a sign of giving up, IMO - I prefer to let obsessive nutcases like Alex "Dick Witham" Cain & Stephen "Truth Crusader" Signorelli prove to the world how truly lifeless they are, while I actually retain my presence here and contribute in a positive manner. Chadbryant 07:34, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(Extensive denial & subsequent mockery of true identity from infamous Usenet pedo-stalker removed.) Chadbryant 08:27, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request

As you probably realise, I have done a great deal to protect your User page from vandalism, including permanently blocking some three or four sock-puppet accounts. However, you're beginning to behave in much the same way as the people I blocked. OK, it's on your own Talk page, so you have some leeway — but that doesn't extend to personal insult and changing other editors' messages. Please stop this before it gets out of hand; a complaint has been lodged against you, and there is some substance to it. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:16, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If the user in question would quit harassing me, there wouldn't be a problem. I only began mocking the abusive user because they ignored repeated requests to not post here. Chadbryant 22:42, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is your Talk page— it's specifically for people posting messages here. You can't forbid them to do so, nor do you have the right to retaliate if they do. You're at liberty to delete their messages unread, but not to misrepresent them by altering what they said. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:48, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine - I will simply delete any comments from Stephen "TruthCrusader" Signorelli from this page without comment. Frankly, he isn't worth this amount of discussion. Chadbryant 22:52, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Duggan

I've tidied it, but it's not obviously a personal attack. Could you explain in more detail? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Explanation forthcoming on the article's talkpage. Chadbryant 19:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks; I've done some more editing in line with your points. Incidentally, TruthCrusader (talk · contribs) has shown himself on a number of occasions to have acted in good faith; he has alerted me to the actions of vandals who were attacking you, and his edits and remarks on Talk:Derek Duggan seem to me to be fair. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:29, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing. FreplySpang (talk) 20:32, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

I don't think that User:ChadBryant is a vandal. I think User:Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious is. Chad, can you explain the DinkSock business for us all? Kelly Martin 20:38, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I reacted too fast. The "dink" in "dink sock" threw me off, too. Anyway, Thanks for your positive contributions, and please keep making them! FreplySpang (talk) 20:40, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

The "Dink Sock" label is for the almost *two dozen* accounts registered here by the same diminutive dimwit. 99% of his editing history has been to vandalize my user/talk pages, and troll/disrupt the editing process of any page I've provided input for. Mel Etitis is well-acquainted with blocking this person's editing access almost on-sight. Sorry for any confusion I've created. Chadbryant 21:04, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SLC TV Stations

Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia! I've noticed all the great TV station articles you have written! Awesome, something I've been meaning to do myself. I don't know if you've seen the List of Salt Lake City media page, but, I would eventually like to clear up all of the red links on that page. :) Also, you might consider joining WikiProject:Utah. --[[User:JonMoore|—Jo nMo ore 20:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)]] 00:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I noticed there were only two stations covered, so I thought I'd fill in some gaps. Sadly, the most info I was able to find was on KJZZ - there isn't much online about the other stations. - Chadbryant 03:03, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

SLC TV: Part II

Hi! Thanks for the kind words! I would like to do the same thing for the radio stations. There are only 3 station articles now: KSL, KJQN (Jack FM [formerly KJQ]) and KXRK (X96). Lots of work (sigh!) --[[User:JonMoore|—Jo nMo ore 20:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)]] 7 July 2005 22:42 (UTC)[reply]

Revert War

Do you want me to protect that page from that jerky guy with bad grammar? Jon 01:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you just deleted my above note. I didn't realize I was an abusive user to you. I've been defending you. Jon 01:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments were not deleted for harassment - User:RSPW Poster has been defacing this page for the past several days, and your comments were posted after one of his harassing reverts. My apologies. Chadbryant 01:24, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that, sorry. Did you want me to protect you talk page, mayhaps? Jon 01:40, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you can protect it (and KTVX, as well as the talk page for Larry H. Miller) from User:RSPW Poster, I would really appreciate it. Chadbryant 01:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Chad,

I'd like you to stop using {{DinkSock}} as it is obviously an attempt to provoke your opponent. Please let admins handle this - I think that you are much too involved in this dispute personally to edit his userpages. Rhobite 21:35, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DinkSock was created by User:Kelly_Martin for the purpose of documenting Alex Cain's numerous sockpuppets. - Chadbryant 21:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pro wrestling WikiProject

Hi Chadbryant, Im Moe Epsilon. I would like to invite you to add your name to the list of members at the professional wrestling Wikiproject since you show an interest in pro wrestling. Hope you join! — Moe ε 06:46, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Bryant

Sorry about that, I assumed it was a personal attack. McPhail 18:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this again for the nth time and protected it with a {{deletedpage}}. Hopefully that should keep things quiet for a bit. howch e ng {chat} 22:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above entries

Hi Chadbryant, it's Moe Epsilon. I was wondering, since apparently OSJ knows you, do you know who he is? He seems to strongly dislike you and dislike is putting it lightly. I belive he created the above account, Captain Spinkicker, too. I reported OSJ and Captain Spinkicker to the The noticeboard so we could get rid of his sockpuppet. So, do you know this guy? — Moe ε 23:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See the above "Note For Admins". - Chadbryant 03:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw the "Note For Admins" section on there now. Sorry that you have to put up with someone lke him. They all got indefinantly blocked, just to let you know. Now it seems like he's more obsessed with annoying me now with all the new messages I been getting. It's alright though, I like to be the center of controversy. I'll be watching your talk page and a few more choice places ro report anymore sock puppets. Talk to you later! :-D — Moe ε 04:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think he's lashing out now due to the fact that his bogus RFA was dismissed and deleted with little or no consideraion. I'm sorry that he's dragging more people into it, but that seems to be the hallmark of his obsessive & anti-social nature. - Chadbryant 05:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your Welcome. I see. Well, I guess he will be back later or tomorrow pending on his message on my talk page about how he's Letting the fun and games begin!!!. Well, I say the more fun and games, the better. — Moe ε 05:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that way doesn't it? — Moe ε 17:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]