User talk:Chad hermanson

(Chad hermanson (talk) 03:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

File permission problem with File:Halevyimg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Halevyimg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 21:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment vote

Hi, just to let you know, I struck through one of your keep votes at the Halevy discussion as we are all only allowed to vote comment once. Thanks Off2riorob (talk) 11:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

woops! understood. sorry about that! :) Chad hermanson (talk) 12:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jeff Halevy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

I've reverted your edits to the article because you removed tags without explanation that are discussed at length on the talk page. --Ronz (talk) 15:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't very nice or civil to completely revert my rewrite. And I removed tags that have no merit in my opinion. Wikipedia isn't the place for you to question the editorial merits of established news sources, such as the official news of the British Virgin Islands. On top of that it's VERY clear you didn't read the Exercise for Men article, HALF OF WHICH is about mental, not physical transformation. Please try to be civil and constructive. I know it's easier to be nasty but we're all human beings here.

Chad hermanson (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is your responsibility to address the tags. I left you a very civil note about this, which you chose to ignore. I'm glad the second warning has gotten you to respond.

"Wikipedia isn't the place..." Actually, we have policies and guidelines specifically about our need to question such sources, including WP:BIO, WP:V, WP:OR, WP:IRS, and WP:NOT.

"On top of that..." I read the article. Rather than making erroneous assumptions, read WP:SELFPUB concerning how we treat such sources. --Ronz (talk) 19:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed your copying of my comments to AfD

Given your comments for the day as a whole (especially [1], [2], [3], and [4]), I found your copying my comments to AfD [5] inappropriate and removed them. AfDs are for discussions on an article's potential for deletion. If you want to summarize my comments in an appropriate manner where the summary is clearly related to the AfD, feel free to do so. --Ronz (talk) 18:33, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Jeff Halevy

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]