User talk:Cha0sc0ntroll

Travis McCoy

Please don't switch the images around on this article - the current one is just fine thanks! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 01:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the current image is much clearer - please don't re-add a tiny unclear image with a couple of non-notable scruffy teenagers in it. Cheers! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 01:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 01:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please enter into a discussion with me as to why you are changing the image. Anywhere will do, I'll see wherever you post it. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 01:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked you to enter into discussions, so now I'm assuming that you're only trying to add a photo of you meeting McCoy. As such, I'm assuming it's a bad-faith edit, and that your refusal to talk to me is because you have no good reason to change the image. Again, please contact me using any page if this is not the case, otherwise I will have to assume vandalism. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Copy of PICT0189.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Copy of PICT0189.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image talk:Copy of PICT0189.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image talk:Copy of PICT0189.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. OsamaK 02:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please read the relevant guidelines referred above.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Ian Cairns 02:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked once again, this time for one week. It appears that almost immediately after the expiration of your previous block, which was for violating WP:3RR and editwarring, you chose to continue your previous actions. If you wish to explain your actions, please do so here. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for editwarring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Regarding edits made during April 16 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - auburnpilot talk 21:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And that goes for uploaded vandalism images, such as Image:Bushisreallydumb.jpeg., as well. - auburnpilot talk 21:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush, you will be blocked from editing. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 21:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. WJBscribe (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]