User talk:Ch rob

This is Ch rob's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library) (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smmurphy was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first paragraph should be focus on what the product is and how it is used, trademark issues probably don't belong. Also, try to find one or two more reliable sources to show the subjects notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ch rob, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This would especially benefit from actual reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help with notability

Hi @SwisterTwister:;

I'm trying to update the article, and have consulted the Notability guidelines, as suggested. I am an independent developer - unrelated to the developer of Sage - who has worked with this library, and (perhaps obviously) feel that it is of note. It seems that there might be several potential issues, and I'm trying to figure out how to deal with them - first, there is the fact that all three referenced articles were authored by the same person, Mr. Bosch. This is true, but they are all peer-reviewed articles, two of which were developed in concert with existing customers, regarding existing commercial work, and all three were presented at simulation industry conferences. Second, it could be seen as an advertisement, but given that it is offered as open-source work, and that the notability page refers to "cleaning up" a page so it doesn't read like an advertisement. Might this be a reasonable avenue?

Before embarking on this effort, I read other pages for simulation and modeling class libraries in the open-source world, and the Ptolemy Project (^[1]) seemed to set a bar I could clear. Is there some element of Sage that I could describe, that might help it to become accepted on the same grounds as that of the Ptolemy Project?

Additionally, I've found other references to HighMAST (which became Sage, as the proposed article describes) which (refereed journal implications aside) may appear more independent, but are less informative, and less authoritative, than the ones listed. Would including one or more of those, help?

^[2] ^[3] ^[4] ^[5]

Please let me know what I might do to help make this article suitable for publication.

Regards, Ch rob (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library) (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kevin12xd was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submitter, please note that, broadly speaking, for a topic to meet notability guidelines, there should be significant coverage on it from reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin12 xd 08:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sage (Discrete Event Simulation Library)

Hello, Ch rob. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 11:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy_Project

[2] ttp://people.idsia.ch/~andrea/sim/simagent.html

[3] ttp://masters.donntu.org/2006/kita/kondrakhin/library/art4.htm

[4] ttps://www.thinkmind.org/download.php?articleid=computation_tools_2014_1_10_80003

[5] ttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.jos.4250004

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]