User talk:Cgooby/Chocolate bunny
Hi, I was reviewing your article and I love the layout of it! It looks pretty good. One thing I noticed was the controversy section could use more information (but I say your note to self so it seems like you're already on it) and it could maybe have a bit of a more neural tone from what I understand that to be. @Cgooby: Jfinlay8 (talk) 02:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Also I filled out this evaluation sheet for you: User:Cgooby/Chocolate_bunny/Jfinlay8_Peer_Review @Cgooby: Jfinlay8 (talk) 21:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hello, I was reviewing your article and your added content improved the overall quality of the article and looks more complete! The strength of the added content is inputting new major sections that keep the information of the article more organized. However, the content added could be improved by adding new sections like the "History" section and the "Health Benefit" section to implement more information that is relevant to the topic. For the image, try to enlarge the image and put in added captions like main ingredient names, course type (dessert), serving temperature, etc if possible. Also, getting rid of the blog post as your source and then inputting another or a couple of reliable sources would be beneficial. @Cgooby: Kimkev1 (talk) 20:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review Response
[edit]Thank you both for your input! I will definitely work on all the things you guys mentioned, and super great idea to add more sections to make it more clear! I am glad neutrality was mentioned since I was unsure how I was sounding in the article and if I needed to work on that. Thank you! @Kimkev1: @Jfinlay8: