User talk:Cg120

Welcome!

Hello, Cg120!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, wizzito | say hello! 01:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Truth Social

Thanks for testing Wikipedia's page move feature. However, moving Truth Social to "Truth? Social" was silly, even if you did move it back. Please only use the page move feature for legitimate purposes in future. Still, I'm glad to have you editing here, and taking Wikipedia:Be bold at its face value. Happy editing! — The Anome (talk) 08:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I bet you feel proud of yourself calling me out. Cg120 (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have a guideline called Assume good faith. I appreciate most of your contributions. I just disagree with some, but in no way do I doubt that you're doing what you're doing believing that it improves the encyclopedia. If you cannot reciprocate this and assume other editors too, even when they disagree with you, are voicing their disagreement in the belief that the outcome of the debate will result in a better encyclopedia (cf. WP:BRD), you will have no place in this project. Nardog (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All you are doing is what your wikipedia "bosses" are telling you to do. Why can't you just take a joke? I mean, it was moved back for pete sake. Take some humor in the fact that the "?" is a joke because Donald Trump is known for not telling the "truth". Why is it even your problem? It was only for a second so I could capture the irony that is DUELY PRESENT, and now just because you feel the need to get out every reprimand possible you are saying this. I guarantee that deep down you found it funny too. Don't listen to anyone above you. Live in the moment. Cg120 (talk) 12:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above was in response not just to the move but also to this and this, which I highly doubt were in jest (and even if they were, that would be no excuse). Just assume good faith and never make personal attacks. It's that simple. Your edits may get reverted, but that doesn't mean anyone is upset and neither should you. Nardog (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You only seemed to be referring to "Truth?". Too bold Cg120 (talk) 16:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits goes against MOS:LEADPRON, a Wikipedia guideline. You may find it helpful to look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Film Enthusiast^✉ 22:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Film Enthusiast^✉ 03:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Nardog (talk) 10:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm so scared yeah this BOT is really convincing. Cg120 (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 16:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colic

Sorry I reverted your pronunciation of colic. As you correctly guessed, I didn't know that vowel was sometimes used. I added the US pronunciation also, which brought to the fore the difference in syllabification. Also added reference to Cambridge English Dictionary, which includes both pronunciations. -- M.boli (talk) 02:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cory in the House (video game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 23:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can go fuck yourself. Cg120 (talk) 23:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Waxworker (talk) 23:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]