User talk:Cfoo

Neale Donald Walsch

I reverted all your changes, because the sources were all blogs and your tone did not meet the neutral point of view policies that we have here. If you wish, we can discuss this on the talk page and hammer out a compromise. I'm not opposed to criticism being there, but it needs to be properly sourced and have the proper tone. JuJube (talk) 02:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response: I've reversed your deletion and changed the original NYTimes blog link in my paragraph to the current NYTimes printed article link. Edit for editorial voice if you wish, but claiming the paragraph lacks substance is not proved by the references available, as cited. Cfoo (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified it slightly and moved it to a Criticism section. I hope that compromise is acceptable. JuJube (talk) 22:49, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Sure, that works. Cfoo (talk) 14:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for the kitten! I had no idea there was a feature like this, Wikipedia sure is weird.

Enno (talk) 04:38, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]