User talk:Cfcfanbd

August 2009

Your recent edit to the page 2007 FIFA World Player of the Year appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. srushe (talk) 11:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to FIFPro. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Adding Frank Lampard to teams and moving him up in awards does not prove you love your team. Stop doing it. srushe (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to UEFA Club Football Awards, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. srushe (talk) 11:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Ballon d'Or 2008. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. srushe (talk) 11:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Lampard

I notice you've been making many edits to the Frank Lampard page recently. I'm glad you are trying to improve an article, but can I take some time to point you to the neutral point of view and no original research policies we have here on Wikipedia. Basically some things you have added, for example, "established himself as one of the best midfielders in he world" and "his second goal in first leg was a stunning one" need citations because otherwise they are just your opinion. Even if this opinion is shared by many, it needs citations so the article doesn't become biased. This includes watching out for peacock terms, for example you would remove powerful from "He scored a ~~powerful~~ goal from 35 yards", and the 35 yards would need a citation. If you are still interested in improving the article I encourage you to fix these things and build a neutral article, otherwise I will change the article to conform to our policies over the next few days. Best wishes, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 20:48, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]