User talk:Cezarika1

Cu plăcere

Ce pot să zic? Cu plăcere. Apropo, dacă vrei să faci asemenea modificări fără să scrii din nou, nu trebuie decât să le reiei într-o versiune mai veche a aceleiaşi pagini. Eu am făcut schimbarea potrivit normei privind rubrica "Generic" de aici şi cu Template:Notenglish0; ca să eviţi asemnea situaţii jenante, îţi sugerez să faci upload cu poze înainte să le introduci în pagină (şi ar fi o idee bună să nu le dai descrieri în limba română pe o pagină în engleză). Dahn 11:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sincer să fiu, nu văd care e problema. Dahn 11:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

În primul rând, şi eu port ochelari. Presupun că ne vom chiorî oricum amândoi ca să citim textul (greu de modificat altfel, şi modificabil doar între parametri minimi), sau nici unul dintre noi nu se va chiorî pentru nimic, şi ne place doar să folosim argumente inutile. Pe lângă logica lui "click for a larger picture", pe care ai intuit-o, mai sunt câteva lucruri pe care ai putea să le iei în consideraţie: pe de o parte, pozele care au copyright sunt oricum disponibile doar în dimensiuni şi rezoluţii minime (mai mici ca 200px ai lui Irimescu) - deci, pentru o grămadă de articole, pur şi simplu nu o să ai ce discuta despre dimensiuni; aşteptarea wikipediei de la un featured article, realistă sau nu, cere mai mult de o poză - dacă una dintre ele ajunge să aibă atât de mult (şi să ocupe jumătate din dispunerea textului pe orizontală), te gândeşti ce se întâmplă la final?; mai mult, un lucru esenţial, o poză pune probleme de detaliu doar dacă prezintă detalii (mi se pare extrem de pretenţios să spui că o poză a unui individ cu o pălărie pe cap trebuie să atingă dimensiunile unui covor pentru că, teoretic, tu nu reuşeşti să distingi câte pene are pe pălărie!; raţionamentul estetic şi practic ar fi fundamentat pentru o scenă de bătălie, sau o orchestră, sau o fotografie de grup). Aş dori să renunţăm la această discuţie: motivaţia ei este un sofism. Dahn 11:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RaduIrimescu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RaduIrimescu.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NicolaeRadescu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NicolaeRadescu.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Orban

Thank you very much for the link and the translation and for your quick response. I needed badly this reference, but i couldn't find it as I do not speak Romanian. Any other possibly useful link or suggestion is welcome. I believe the article on Orban has reached a very good level and, with some more effort, it can become even a featured article. Thanks again! --Michkalas 18:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inscription on Cross Stone

Here is the exact expert translation of the inscription:

"To the memory of Lusik Koylawean, beloved wife of Dawit', daughter of Paghtasar, who was married in Po't'shan. Oh Lord, accept this Your resplendent Church in Homori." Best wishes, -- Zara-arush (talk) 20:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

translation (armenian text)

Many words I don't recognize in there mate. I don't even think some of them are words. "Z-memroial...the birth... the death of...marriage...falling..." I even tried Google Translate to see if it's my lack of vocabulary, and most words are just transliterated instead and not translated (therefore, inexistent in Google Translate's bank of words). Where did you get this from? The fact that the word memorial (hishatak) starts with a Z makes me think it's from Grabar (old Armenian). If that's the case, I won't be able to help you.KentronHayastan (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

update: http://hy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Վիքիփեդիա:Խորհրդարան read the "translation" section.KentronHayastan (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

update 2: all right, I just realized someone else already answered you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KentronHayastan (talk • contribs) 23:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]