User talk:Cerrot

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HandsomeFella (talk) 17:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making all these moves without consensus, and against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 18:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On further inspection, I believe this account has been compromised, and is no longer in the hands of the individual who created it. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 18:38, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He does have 4 "non-move" edits today and some suspicious PRODs from 2010 were bought up at ANI. In any case he's got some splainin to do before we consider an unblock. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SeeWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dolovis --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cerrot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is my account, it is not compromised. i dont do much editing for wikipedia and when i do i dont usually bother to log in, but i did log in so i could move some articles because they needed to be moved because they were named diffrent from there sources and references, and were using foriegn letters not on my keyboard. the HELP instructions says to BE BOLD, so i moved them, and i also had found some moved articles that were controversial because they were moved to names diffrent from there sources and references, so i contested those moves as is my right. i dont know dolovos, so i want to be unblocked. i dont think any prods i made were suspicious, but if they were then i am sorry. Cerrot (talk) 04:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nobody buys this, Dolovis. Max Semenik (talk) 07:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i am not dolovis

Proposed deletion of Scott Scurfield

The article Scott Scurfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]