Jump to content

User talk:Ceranthor/Archive 23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25→Archive 30

WP Earthquakes in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Earthquakes for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

I will extend the interview elsewhere. As of right now there are two users in particular who are far more active in that respect and who are far more interesting people than I. ceranthor 00:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate London Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's New South Wales Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr (Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare (Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus (Alaska Keilana (submissions) and New South Wales Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John (Indiana Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Jane Cobden

You kindly offered to help me out if the need arose; I'd be grateful if you'd glance at the lady above, and leave a comment or two on the peer review page. Many thanks. Brianboulton (talk) 15:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Gladly. It will take me until this weekend. I will strive to look over it and post comments by Saturday. ceranthor 19:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Paul S. Walsh

Thanks for your comments on the article. I have taken most of them onboard, and given my reasons when I haven't. I'd like to hear your feedback! Cheers. Farrtj (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Farrtj, I have responded at the FAC. ceranthor 12:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

mabdul 11:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Responded at talk.

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and second place Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

G. Wayne Clough

Thanks for reviewing this article and providing suggestions for improvement. I am currently waiting on User:Disavian to respond to your feedback before I continue editing this article. Thanks again Mistercontributer (talk) 00:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I will respond when Disavian returns. Thanks for your help. ceranthor 01:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
I finally made some time to reply to your comments and include relevant diffs. I have to say you're a great reviewer, and thanks for your suggestions. I think the pending issues from what you've highlighted so far include rephrasing the "against his will", the olympics bit, and the explanation as to why the reorganization was controversial. Disavian (talk) 06:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Looks like the nom is being archived, but if you're willing to continue to review the article, perhaps on the talk page, I'd like to toss it back to FAC after the two week waiting period is over. Disavian (talk) 20:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Definitely will. Sorry to see that! ceranthor 00:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Malayan Banded Pitta
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Hydrornis irena - Sri Phang Nga.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! ceranthor 22:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Mount Meager

Hey, I might get back to this article sometime soon. I have been largely inactive editing volcanology articles for quite some time. Volcanoguy 17:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Sounds like a good project. I'll be glad to help out! ceranthor
I left a comment on the talk page if you have anything to say. Volcanoguy 03:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Okay, I'm checking it out. ceranthor 01:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Poland Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and Canada Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: In A Mirror

These days with my wiki-time it takes me a while to get to anything; it's on my to-do list for this weekend however :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Excellent. ceranthor 18:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Mahogany Mountain refs

Hi, back in May 2010 you created the Mahogany Mountain article. The problem is that you left incomplete references (Bishop, p. 158; Warman, p. 14; Barnes, p. 67; Verts and Carraway, p. 33). I've done a bit of searching, but haven't found 'em yet - so decided to leave you a note. Could you provide the missing details? (Yeah, I know that was 3 years ago:) Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 16:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh gosh, even with my eidetic memory I only vaguely remember this article... I'll put it on my todo list. Thanks for letting me know. ceranthor 18:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 Dingxi earthquakes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • with a focal depth of {{convert|20.0| km|mi|0}}.<ref name=cenc/> It is measured at M<sub>s</sub>]] 5.9 by the [[United States Geological Survey]] (USGS)<ref name=usgs>{{cite web|url=http://comcat.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I think it's okay. Thanks. ceranthor 23:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Reconsider

Since you mentioned the oppose rationale, i thought you'd be interested in reading my oppose in WP:Requests for adminship/Adjwilley. Pass a Method talk 01:47, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Ceran, see my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Kudpung, I commented. ceranthor 18:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jim Motavalli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I fixed it. ceranthor 14:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Canada Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, London Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Poland Piotrus (submissions), Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:54, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jim Motavalli

Hello! Your submission of Jim Motavalli at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. ceranthor 20:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Mike Capel

Hello, Ceranthor, I've expanded the Mike Capel article here. Where else does the prose feel light? Albacore (talk) 16:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm looking now. I'll elucidate my concerns at the FAC. ceranthor 20:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joel West Flood may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1964), was a lawyer, the brother of [[Henry De La Warr Flood]], and uncle of [[Harry Flood Byrd]]), a Representative from Virginia. He was born near Appomattox, [[Appomattox County, Virginia]],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:35, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Ergh, I'm a fool. Fixed. ceranthor 06:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Glicken

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Harry Glicken you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dawnseeker2000 -- Dawnseeker2000 (talk) 19:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Dawnseeker. I responded to your comments. ceranthor 00:24, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Harry Glicken

Hey Ceranthor, I left a some (short) notes on the review page. The article is in good shape with only a minor request. Dawnseeker2000 23:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks so much. ceranthor 00:24, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Jim Motavalli

Alex Shih(talk) 00:03, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Awesome! Thanks. ceranthor 00:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Glicken

The article Harry Glicken you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harry Glicken for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dawnseeker2000 -- Dawnseeker2000 (talk) 00:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Woohoo! Thanks so much. :) ceranthor 01:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1970 Colombia earthquake

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Cool, thanks! ceranthor 00:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Note to self

Guangala. ceranthor 01:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Mahogany Mountain refs. ceranthor 01:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


Okay, all good. ceranthor 03:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1970 Colombia earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Juan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Grr. ceranthor 13:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Halo: CEA

I've responded to your comments on the FAC page. Thanks again for the look-over. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 02:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Great, and you're welcome! ceranthor 04:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1989 West Papua earthquake

Alex ShihTalk 03:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Yay! Thank you. ceranthor 03:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1980 Honduras earthquake

The DYK project (nominate) 00:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Woohoo! Thank you. ceranthor 02:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1904 Samos earthquake

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! ceranthor 01:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings, fellow reviewer

It appears Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Law School of Beirut/archive1 is going to close soon. Do you have any follow-up, or parting opinions? (It's not an easy case.) All the best, – Quadell (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I've provided some more comments. ceranthor 02:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:FOUR RFC

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I have no interest in quarreling with people over the internet. ceranthor 02:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

FAC

Hey, sorry for bugging in. I went through the article a few more times. I would appreciate if you'd let me know if you still think the article is below par or not. Thanks, Nergaal (talk) 02:35, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Review pending! ceranthor 14:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

FA Thanks

This user helped promote Mike Capel to featured article status.

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial efforts that have brought Mike Capel to WP:FA status.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm glad it was promoted! ceranthor 14:27, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Omayra Sánchez

This is a note to let the main editors of Omayra Sánchez know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on August 28, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 28, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Omayra Sánchez Garzón (1972–85) was a 13-year-old Colombian girl killed in Armero, Colombia, by the 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz. Volcanic debris mixed with ice to form massive lahars (volcanically induced mudslides, landslides, and debris flows) that rushed into the river valleys below the mountain, killing nearly 25,000 people and destroying Armero and 13 other villages. After a lahar demolished her home, Omayra was trapped beneath the debris of her house for three days. Her plight was documented as she descended from calmness into agony. Her courage and dignity touched journalists and relief workers. After 60 hours of struggling, she died, likely due to exposure. Her death highlighted the failure of officials to respond promptly to the threat of the volcano and the efforts of volunteer rescue workers despite a dearth of supplies and equipment. Omayra became internationally famous through a photograph of her taken shortly before her death by the photojournalist Frank Fournier, which was designated the World Press Photo of the Year for 1985. She has remained a lasting figure in popular culture, remembered through music, literature, and commemorative articles. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Ceranthor, for getting this article to FA-level and featured on the main page. I've read it before, but the story of this tragedy is still very powerful every time I read it. Carcharoth (talk) 02:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

I almost want her life to be commemorated in some sort of novel, but having spent so much time learning about her I fear it will be adopted into a film in horrible fashion and nobody will understand what horrors Omayra endured with such incredible bravery. If only more people knew her horrific plight... ceranthor 02:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Many will understand today more on incredible bravery, thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

  1. Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
  2. New South Wales Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
  3. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
  4. Canada Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
  5. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
  6. Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
  7. London Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
  8. Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Poland Piotrus (submissions), Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions), Michigan Dana boomer (submissions), Prince Edward Island Status (submissions), United States Ed! (submissions), Florida 12george1 (submissions), England Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 06:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1983 Luzon earthquake

Allen3 talk 12:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks! ceranthor 19:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ceranthor/Archive_23&oldid=1143367070"