User talk:Centaurcentral

talk away...

May 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Christianity in India. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 19:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Christianity in India. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Mephistophelian † 19:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 21:56, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Centaurcentral (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry I did not realise that I was engaging in unacceptable behavior according to Wikipedia norms. I am a new wikipedia user and I am very passionate about the topic concerned and therefore got a little carried away. I will not repeat this. I will wait for a consensus in the discussion section

Decline reason:

The thing is, you were warned about it and kept right on anyway, so in fact you were informed of the edit warring policy. It's only a one day block, get some sleep and try to take a more detached approach to editing tomorrow. In the future, be aware that of alternatives to edit warring such as requesting page protection or pusruing any of our various forms of dispute resolution. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.