User talk:Cenakhoa

Welcome!

Hi, Cenakhoa. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Dloh cierekim 01:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Cenakhoa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Keep Victoria Beautiful, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keep Victoria Beautiful

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Keep Victoria Beautiful, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Speedy Deletion

Hello, Cenakhoa. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.

I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.

Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.

Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.

Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.

Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.

Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.

For test edits, click Cenakhoa/sandbox

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search

If you have verifiable information from reliable sources that show subject does meet notability requirements Let me know.
CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED.

Dloh cierekim 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Hi, you are allowed to rewrite your article but it needs to be written in the neutral tone of a paper encyclopedia and have references to WP:Reliable sources. or it will be vulnerable to deletion, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The afore mentioned Wikipedia:Article wizard/Subject can help guide you stepwise. Dloh cierekim 19:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep victoria beautiful (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We would need a better focus in adding all additional major independent news, and not simply announcements or notices.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cenakhoa/Keep victoria beautiful and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Sorry , have been offline. I think your article is good now much better than the version I nominated for G11, if you can wait a week and then resubmit it and give me a ping, I'll review it Atlantic306 (talk) 07:45, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it would be better if after a week you pinged me and waited for reply thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

as another reviewer. I've looked at it. We do not usually have articles for state branches of national iorganizations. Why not add the material to the national article--it may help encourage other to fill in information also. DGG ( talk ) 00:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be best otherwise it will likely be deleted at WP:AFD Atlantic306 (talk) 00:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Atlantic306, User:DGG, As cited in Keep Australia Beautiful's website (http://kab.org.au/ourmission/) and wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keep_Australia_Beautiful)"The Keep Australia Beautiful Network (KAB), consisting of an independent federation network in each State and Territory". Keep Victoria beautiful and Keep Australia beautiful is independent to each other although the naming might caused confusion. The only common program betweens different territories in Australia is the Tidy Towns and Sustainable cities awards program. In each state, there are signature programs that belongs to each independent member. Could you please re-consider my request ? Thank you and regards, Cenakhoa (talk) 00:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

.Hi, perhaps you could ask DGG on his talkpage as he is much more experienced than myself , thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 03:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantic306, I will contact DGG as you suggested. Regards with many thanks, Cenakhoa (talk) 03:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keep victoria beautiful (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Keep victoria beautiful instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keep victoria beautiful and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 14:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Cenakhoa, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Atlantic306 (talk) 14:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Keep victoria beautiful concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Keep victoria beautiful, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Keep victoria beautiful

Hello, Cenakhoa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keep victoria beautiful".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Ultrasound Education Group. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08: Thank you Zackmann08 for your detailed instruction, I will remember this for future editing --Cenakhoa (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultrasound Education Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ultrasound Education Group, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://medicine.unimelb.edu.au/uegres. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zackmann08: Thank you Zackmann08 for deleting the inappropriate article, I really appreciate it, I would like to clarify some information before I rewrite better version of this article. Also I would like to listen to some suggestion and advice from you. At the moment, I am a student at the University of Melbourne and would like to contribute an article about a research group that I have known, which was the Ultrasound Education Group at the Melbourne Medical School. I didn't aware that copy and paste the content from the website is not allowed despite the fact that I have written some parts of the website https://medicine.unimelb.edu.au/uegres and https://medicine.unimelb.edu.au/ueg in my partime intern. I will also reduce the mentions of the lecturers and researchers in the group and focus more on the impacts of the research and clinical education that this group had contributed for the society and medical education in Australia. Finally I will give more citation from reliable sources and medical associations, which mentioned this group's research outcomes such as The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Anaesthesia Continuing Education (ACE) Committee and The College of Intensive Care Medicine Australia. --Cenakhoa (talk) 23:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultrasound Education Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ultrasound Education Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cenakhoa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cenakhoa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak:@DGG: Hi Jimfbleak & DGG, thank you for notifying me about the deletion of Ultrasound Education Group and inform me what should I do next.

I have placed the COI tag under my User:Cenakhoa, can I write a Draft here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ultrasound_Education_Group and notify you when it's done for review?
I will remove citations from the UEG's domain, however I have already inserted a lot of citations from independance and verifiable sources including journal from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_England_Journal_of_Medicine, one of the most prestigious peer review journal for UEG noticable research outcome, I hope that those citations will be taken to consideration for my good wills of contribution and to neutralise my tone of writing to make this article more encyclopedic. Others citations that I have cited are from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Association_for_Cardio-Thoracic_Surgery and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_News which also meet the notability guidelines.
I will pay more attention to text copied elsewhere, however the part about UEG's research topic is simply to list all of the research themes. There were very limited different ways to paraphrase to make a significant different statement. Would you mind advising me where should I modify to avoid this mistake again?
thank you sincerely --Cenakhoa (talk) 03:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ultrasound Education Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ultrasound Education Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ultrasound Education Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ultrasound Education Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultrasound Education Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Melbourne Biomedical Precinct

Hello, Cenakhoa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melbourne Biomedical Precinct".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:10, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]