User talk:Celtic fiddler

Máiréad pic

Just thought I'd drop a note of thanks for providing that photograph of Máiréad. Looks great! However, as it has been released into the public domain, I'm going to move it over to Commons (commons.wikimedia.org) so that it is available to a wider audience. I'll provide you with a link once it is moved. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 02:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the image has been uploaded to Commons at Image:Bnsigningmaireadnesbitt.jpg. I also edited the image to try and reduce the oversaturation and graininess (Image:Bnsigningmaireadnesbitt-edit.jpg). Take care. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 04:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, those new uploads are very nice...shows what limited software I have to work with. In light of these, would it be acceptable to have the original image deleted in favour of these? — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's fine with me if you want to delete the older versions.Celtic fiddler (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good deal, I'll get everything taken care of. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 01:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karl Nesbitt

The article Karl Nesbitt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: does not meet WP:NMUSIC. Coverage I see is extremely trivial and/or local. Article cited to non RS or primary source. Created by single purpose account Special:Contributions/Celtic_fiddler.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amy Rivard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Rivard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Rivard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]