User talk:Celebrityguyxy

Moving Harold Klemp to Sri Harold Klemp could be controversial. Therefore you should follow the procedure at Requested moves, which will allow discussion to be made. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) may also be interesting.--Commander Keane 02:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it would be controversial; I've worked on the Eckankar articles since August and they get relatively low attention. You do have a point about the popes; the article is Pope John Paul II rather than John Paul II. In the mean time I've created a redirect for Sri Harold Klemp, so there should be no problem moving Harold Klemp; it wouldn't require administrative tools. But I think we should wait a while to see if anyone objects on the talk page. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 03:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment

Hi, It is making it more difficult for researchers by adding "Sri" to Sri Klemp's name. Everytime a search is done for Harold Klemp, Wiki has to keep performing a redirect. I was told that Wiki prefers the directs instead of redirects.

If you notice, Harold Klemp himself does not publish his books as "Sri Harold Klemp." This title of respect should be put in his bio because it makes it more difficult to find him when doing research. It is going to mess up the categories, etc.

Instead, the title should be added to the bio or somehow fixed to make it easier for researchers. I don't know how to fix it. So I will put a request on my talk page for help.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. KarateLadyKarateLady 15:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, I object to the change based on the complication for research, not due to any disrespect for Sri Harold Klemp. My area of interest on here is primarily health and wellness bios, but I like working on articles of other authors too. KarateLadyKarateLady 15:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]