User talk:Cecac

Your recent editing history at Mehmed IV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beshogur (talk) 14:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gülbahar Hatun (mother of Bayezid II). BusterD (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are speaking nonsense? Gülbahar mother of Bayezid II was Valide hatun not Valide Sultan check you sources again. Cecac (talk) 15:58, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These warnings are about demonstrated bad behavior, edit warring instead of reasonably discussing disagreement. BusterD (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im here getting a warning but not them. Cecac (talk) 16:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. I can't see where you ever explained any of your edits: combined with the edit warring, what administrators will see here is an unwillingness to work in a collaborative environment. Drmies (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt got answer to my question Cecac (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should have thanked you previously for engaging on your talk page. Thank you for your courtesy. The correct answer is that we usually use user talkpages for discussions of behavior, and article talkpages, in this case Talk:Gülbahar Hatun (mother of Bayezid II) and Talk:Mehmed IV for discussion of content or sources. Since smart people often disagree, discussion and consensus are preferred to conflict. If it seems User:Drmies or I are non-committal as to assertion, we are usually referees and prefer content experts like yourself to work out differences on talk. If you felt antagonism or boldness, please understand we see a lot of disruption, and when we see "did not"/"did too" behaviors, especially multiple identical reverts on a page (for which we have a maximum acceptable limit of 3), we must warn against such behavior. BusterD (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Donatella Versace💜 Cecac (talk) 20:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turhan Sultan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add information without providing sources.15:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced info into the article Turhan Sultan. This is a violation of Wikipedia rules. You may be blocked from editing for this. - Altenmann >talk 20:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]