User talk:Cdnwpe018

Your submission at Articles for creation

Fritz Spiess, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

StandardSwan (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Research Survey

Hi Cdnwpe018,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We are creating a tool, called wikiFeed, that will help Wikipedia editors make connections between content from Twitter or RSS news feeds and Wikipedia articles. We are currently gathering data which will help us in the development process and would love to learn about how you consume news content and how it relates to your Wikipedia editing. If you would like to help, follow this link to complete a brief survey. Your feedback will help us create a better tool.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. Thanks for your time! RachulAdmas (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not significant to establish convincing independent notability, there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else and the sourcing here is still only announcements and mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cdnwpe018/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:SwisterTwister, this is only my 2nd page attempt. I've added significant citations and references and cleaned up the formatting. I hope this helps and would appreciate anyone's help in having this moved from my sandbox to a live page.

AfC notification: Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:SwisterTwister, thanks for your guidance. I've added more citations and also have seen other editors start to add more to the page. I'm hoping this is enough to have the page moved to a real entry where I'm confident it will continue to improve? Can you do make that move? Please note that somehow the draft page took all the old entries from my sandbox, maybe that can be removed when the current draft becomes real? Thank you. Cdnwpe018 (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Ivan McLeod (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Antonioatrylia was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article need more references from reliable sources independent of the subject. Sources need to contain significant coverage not mere trivial mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Antonioatrylia (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Cdnwpe018, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Antonioatrylia (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod

Hello, Cdnwpe018. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald Ivan McLeod".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. G13 account of Linguist111 (talk) 15:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]