User talk:Cdk157

Snowfix

A tag has been placed on Snowfix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Snowfix is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Snowfix saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowfix for deletion discussion. ∴ here…♠ 21:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your note. I would recommend writing an article in your userspace at User:Cdk157/Snowfix which establishes notability based on Wikipedia:Notability (web), most importantly: The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.. For example, multiple articles in a major snowboard magazines devoted to your podcast. iTunes inclusion does not count for much, as they are simply an aggregator, though the occasional featured status will help. You may then submit the article for deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~~I've requested that the deleted contents be provided for expansion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Content review.~~ Feel free to ask if you would like any help along the way! ∴ here…♠ 21:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what User:Here said above. You are welcome to take the article to deletion review, but the topic must meet the criteria specified in Wikipedia:Notability. Notability was the main concern in the deletion debate. A podcast about "a very specialised topic" probably doesn't meet notability requirements, but I could be wrong. Provided that you can give reliable sources confirming the TV show, then you might have a case on keeping/reinstating the article. Anyways, at any time you feel that you have a case for its undeletion, you can take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Good luck, and If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 04:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The deleted contents from Snowfix have been copied to User:Cdk157/Snowfix. Add a few more sources and drop a line if you submit for review ;). ∴ here…♠ 17:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey looking at this further, the extreme sports channel is bigger than I thought. Do you know of any reference to the podcast in a print publication? A solid second reference showing notability should be enough.. It may require proof that the podcast will be a TV show -- can you show that somehow? Best.. keep pumpin 'em out ;). ∴ here…♠ 17:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...As of yet there's no articles mentioning the TV show status for the third season as it hasn't been officially announced yet but I'll work on the article for the Notability status by using some magazine/website articles. Thanks for your help, Cdk157 23:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC) ( from user_talk:here )

Great, see if you can follow Wikipedia:Reliable sources when picking which articles to use.. Larger is better, and blogs or similar are usually avoided. Don't worry too much about formating, just drop in links and/or title/issue/date/articletitle/page/etc citations. Edit at User:Cdk157/Snowfix for now until you get a few more. You can reply here if you like, as I am watching this page. Talk pages still annoy me sometimes on here, but you can read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines if you like. ∴ here…♠ 02:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

welcome

Apologies for not extended a formal welcome before the deletion notice ;). You seem to have found your way around already, but {{welcome}} provides some great links for new users. Regardless of the outcome of Snowfix, stick around and help improve the encyclopedia! Best .. ∴ here…♠ 21:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Snowfix Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Snowfix Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]