User talk:Cdaly2012

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cdaly2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i guess there's no way to prove im not him, what should i do though i enjoy editing the Hollyoaks page and they have all been constructive edits so is my block permanent or could i have a chance to prove im not spamming and will make valid edits

Accept reason:

After a discussion with this user on IRC and reviewing with another administrator I have accepted this unblock request. Looking at the CheckUser data, I would call this an Unlikely at best. It's been made clear that any disruption will result in the account being blocked again. Tiptoety ^talk 04:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hollyoaks

Just a quick note to request that addition of information with an uncertain tone such as this is avoided. There is no source to support the claim and it is rather trivial. We should be aiming to add as much real world content to these articles as possible now rather than focusing on the in universe aspect. Thank you.Rain the 1 02:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sorry just meant to state the fact that scott had departed and its not known if she still remains there (Cdaly2012 (talk) 02:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I know. It isn't that important though - maybe if a reliable source reported on it then it would be worth a mention. What I mean by the real world perspective is to explain why the changes occured within the serial. So if there is something about changing the direction of a household, The Dog or the Halls etc - then mention it with the source. Try not to focus too much on the comings and goings of everyone.Rain the 1 02:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add - be careful about adding strong claims as fact without citing a source. Such as this edit - [1] - Any infromation that is not storylines (as the episodes themselves are the source) will generally need to be sourced.Rain the 1 02:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Will Savage (Hollyoaks) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Will Savage (Hollyoaks), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Will Savage (Hollyoaks)

Hello Cdaly2012. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Will Savage (Hollyoaks).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Will Savage (Hollyoaks)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]