User talk:Ccrazymann/Archive 2

Trey Grayson

The information about Mr. Grayson being a Democrat, is listed in his early years and career (where it is relevant). User SineDie519 has created an account to constantly vandalize Mr. Grayson's wikipedia page. He tries to list an attack website, treygrayson.info, as Mr. Grayson's Official Campaign Page and this is not the case. His official campaign page is TreyGrayson.com.

Any help you could provide in stopping this constant string of vandalism would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.142.113.42 (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've noticed that you're starring in a edit war in the article Trey Grayson. Take precautions could be blocked, you can their arguments and demonstrate their references in the article talk page. Before making changes and so exchange views with other publishers and agree on changes. Chummer, administrators or collaborators do not have access to that kind of info; only Checkusers do. Greetings. Ccrazymann (talk) 18:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Piece of Strange

I notice that several of your reverts on this page restored uncited information. Please remember that per WP:V, it is always proper to remove uncited information, and if someone replaces uncited information with poorly-cited information, the poorly-cited information should either stay or, if contentious, be removed (not reverted). Please be more careful, as your actions on this page have led to a complaint to the OTRS. Stifle (talk) 16:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What I did was reverse some editions of the User:Kno CunninLynguists, apparently added Spam, page on which there is a "conflict of interest" apparently. Ccrazymann (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't dispute that, but some parts of the edit were good and removed uncited statements. Stifle (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, though I disagree that "some of your edits were good", added Spam and controversial references. Greetings. Ccrazymann (talk) 16:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autofellatio

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Autofellatio, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. HalfShadow 16:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, all I did was to remove [the image], which was added by an anonymous user, a picture quite controversial and explicit, which can only be verified and added the by administrator. (WP: POLICY). Ccrazymann (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the date; the picture's been there since last May. HalfShadow 16:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warned you for deletion, not vandalism; standard procedure. You aren't a regular, and you removed something with no explanation that's a common target. I have to warn you. HalfShadow 16:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute

To stop the ongoing edit war at White Latin American, I have temporarily protected the page. Please discuss your point of view here, and remember to stay calm and civil. If, after three days, you feel you are unable to compromise, you may seek dispute resolution. Anyone continuing the edit war after the page protection ends will be blocked immediately. Nobody wins when that happens, so let's not have it come to that. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 01:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I agree Kafziel, thanks for the recommendations. Ccrazymann (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]