User talk:Cccyyz099

November 2022

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Alfa Romeo Tonale Aaron Liu (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yes I am checking if it is American accent or British, but some articles are half American half British so I make them all British or American as the subject is related too. Cccyyz099 (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Hardon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 14:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, But I only edit the content not the citation, but if it changed the citation so sorry for it Cccyyz099 (talk) 14:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You changed a direct quote that was easily verifiable by following the link in the citation. Please do not edit content that consists of direct quotes that are intended to stay intact. Elizium23 (talk) 15:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know, in 8 hours since you created your account, you've racked up like 150 edits, going every 1-4 minutes. It's an improbable pace and you're making a lot of mistakes. I am not sure you are entirely human. I'm going to ping @Drmies just out of random curiosity here for another opinion. @Aaron Liu may also have a follow-on idea about you. Please slow down, think about what you are editing, especially if you have no particular expertise in the lingo (military jargon?) and help us answer why you want to improve these random handfuls of articles. Elizium23 (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizium23, I don't know what to say. Some edits are OK, some are clearly not. Some people do edit quickly, but in this case, the editor--whose English is not flawless--really needs to slow down and to leave comprehensive and insightful edit summaries. Drmies (talk) 18:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personaly I think they are a user who came to wikipedia and binged newcomer tasks and not botting. Newcomer tasks give you random articles to improve. Aaron Liu (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok thanks for notice, but I edit all the topics in proper way

Today I am free at home and I am sick, I am filling my time with editing Wikipedia articles Cccyyz099 (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My old account globally blocked, because of a Ransomware attack and I lost most of my accounts

I made this two days ago and I want to help Wikipedia community Cccyyz099 (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I too have been going through your edits and have found numerous problems. The fact that you think you "edit all the topics in a proper way" is very concerning, since that is clearly not the case. As just a few examples: in this edit you changed "some aspects of this illness are" to "some aspects of this illness is", which is incorrect grammar. In this edit you actually changed the title of a reference, which thereby misquotes the source, and changed "The Partnership aim", which is correct British English, to "The Partnership aims", while the article is written in British English. In this edit you changed "to found a village", which was correct, to "to find a village", which means something completely different. In this edit you changed "Links was also ported" to "Links were also ported" which is wrong since "Links" is the name of a program, not a plural noun. In this edit you changed the verbal phrase "may be" to the adverb "maybe", you changed "the defendant claimed mistakenly to believe" to "the defendant claimed mistakenly believed", which is incorrect grammar, you changed the direct quote of a legal verdict in several places, and made other grammatical changes which are dubious or flatly incorrect. In this edit you changed the correct plural noun "stays at her bed and breakfast" to the incorrect singular "stay" and other dubious grammatical changes. Honestly, I see problems in pretty much every single one of the edits you've made, but I don't have the time to go through all of them in detail.

Finally, if you had an account that is now globally blocked, you should not be editing at all, but should be requesting that your old account be unblocked. If I am understanding your situation, you seem to be evading a block. CodeTalker (talk) 18:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It had been blocked because of shit edits, and I requested many times and all the time heard not possible, But after this I will pay more attention in my edits

Thanks for noticing with references Cccyyz099 (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the name of your original account? Elizium23 (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://zeytoon.wiki

Even I have registered a domain for it before Cccyyz099 (talk) 19:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am in Wikipedia just to make a better community for other's and improve my knowledge

When I read an article and solve the mistakes, It help me to learn something new

But if you think Wikipedia is not a place for me to edit it, then I won't edit again Cccyyz099 (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about your ransomware attack, but I suggest you run somewhere else. Elizium23 (talk) 19:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere else like where? Cccyyz099 (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I try my best to don't do something wrong after this Cccyyz099 (talk) 19:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you my old account to block me?

Why you requested block for me?

Really I don't know what is your peoblem with me Cccyyz099 (talk) 06:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is so bad that I named you my attacked User and said I was attacked with ransomeware but you blocked this account too Cccyyz099 (talk) 06:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Jafarfrotan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cccyyz099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I knew about Wikipedia and so I changed my IP and send my before ID as the domain link, why you want to do like this, Wikipedia is not your father's, it is for everyone and I didn't do anything wrong yet and this is new account, as law you can not block this account when even the IP don't touch and unblock me ASAP Cccyyz099 (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is my mom's. Unblock request does not relate to anything in reality. Drmies (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cccyyz099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia is IP sensitive, as I said before that Persian Wikipedia moderator don't accept to unblock me, why you don't want to know what I saying or you what? :Please unblock this account and up to now I didn't do anything wrong with this account and you can punish me for the next one Cccyyz099 (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think we're done here. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cccyyz099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what is your problem with me, I don't know this user and my PC was attacked with ransomeware, I have wasted my time please unblock me and I am not related to this user that you are talking aboutCccyyz099 (talk) 05:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You said you were globally blocked, this means you are evading a block. You must return to your original account and get the global block removed before attempting to request its unblock here locally. Even if that is not correct and you were attacked by ransomware, this account must remain blocked as compromised. So either way, this account is not being unblocked. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|I have paid much for my ISP to change my IP to a dedicated IP and I don't want to open again that account so Wikipedia bots will block me and I don't want to waste my time with these things, I know Wikipedia is IP sensitive and I will never login back to my blocked acc} Cccyyz099 (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cccyyz099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't want that account and I want to work with this account, because as I mentione Bbb23 wanted to do for me, but I don't know what the hacker did with fawiki that a moderator from persian wiki declined it and now I have got another internet and changed the IP, please unblock this account for me

Decline reason:

Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. You (you personally) are blocked and are not permitted to edit until the block on your original account is lifted. Yamla (talk) 13:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.