User talk:Cbna kbsa

Srebrenica articles

Cbna kbsa very briefly, since I must go. Wikipedia articles and text are based on WP:COMMONNAME, they aren't based on either legal rulings, nor even on the wishes of the victims - which are almost impossible to assess anyway. The more common name for what occurred at Srebrenica has been established to be 'massacre', though 'genocide' is given as an alternative - as are all the facts about court rulings. In my experience, victim relatives are deeply offended if anyone seeks to deny that around 8,000 + people were cruelly and shamefully murdered in cold-blood, but not over concerned whether that is called 'mass-murder', 'massacre' or 'genocide', the only difference being the ethnic targetting of the latter word.

Secondly,WP:BRD dictates that if your edit is challenged, you don't simply engage in an edit war, but the article reverts to the stable version until a new consensus is reached. The WP:ONUS is on you to persuade other editors of the rightness of the changes you wish to make, not on others to defend the stable text. I am accordingly reverting to stable versions and you are free to start a discussion on talk about the changes you wish to make and/or a renaming of the 'massacre' article.

Pincrete (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your long message on my talk page misses the point about names. WP articles and events described on WP use the more common name. You are arguing about what you think people SHOULD call the events at Srebrenica, rather than what they DO call those events. No matter how well-intentioned that might be, it isn't going to sway anyone here, because we are neutral documenters, not advocates of any kind. You are perfectly free to use any website you are involved with to persuade people to use what you think is the 'correct' term, but WP doesn't do that. It follows rather than leads English usage. FWIW, for many years, I, and quite a few other UK people used to speak of "the Fall of Srebrenica", because that was the earliest description common in the UK. Those of us who used that term were perfectly clear that mass-murder of many unarmed men and boys had almost certainly occurred,(things were suspected but not proven at that stage) with no better reason than that the victims were caught in the wrong place at the wrong time and were of the 'wrong' ethnicity. My own theory as to why 'massacre' is more common is nothing to do with down-playing or negating, it's largely that a considerable time came between the killings and the ICTY judgements, that time was long enough for a COMMONNAME to be established, but as I said previously, discussion should take place on article talk pages. Take care Pincrete (talk) 21:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Congress of Bosniaks of North America

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Congress of Bosniaks of North America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://bosniak.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 18:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for letting us know about the copyright rules related to copy and pasting text from websites directly. We are new to page creation and did not know this. We are owners of the website we copied from (www.bosniak.org) and now understand that we must donate to Wiki any text we want to use from the page directly. We will work on this separately, but just wanted to send a note of thanks for the guidance. We recreated the page again but this time just summarizing info about the organization in our own words for now so we can keep the page open. Thanks! Cbna kbsa (talk) 19:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Salvio giuliano

20:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congress of Bosniaks of North America moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Congress of Bosniaks of North America. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and sources should meet the guidelines at WP:GNG, the current only link on the page is not independent of the subject.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ASUKITE 21:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to unblock

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cbna kbsa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

BosniakAcademic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. I was not trying to promote CBNA. Rather, I was trying to create a page that would educate people about what they do and who they are. I have changed the username so as to separate this account from the organization. I hope this is sufficient. I also want to disclose that I am a board member of the organization who does not receive compensation. I set up the Wiki page on a volunteer basis and I planned to simply kick start the page and have a community volunteer group take over making updates to it. My contribution to this will include connecting people who have been affiliated with the organization over the past 20 years to document their contributions and achievements, so that we can have them all documented in an informational and factual way on Wiki. Please let me know if you need anything else from me. Cbna kbsa (talk) 21:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I was trying to create a page that would educate people about what they do and who they are" is the definition of promotion. It doesn't require selling something. Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves; our articles summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about your organization. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you want to edit about other topics in the short term, please tell what. 331dot (talk) 21:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Congress of Bosniaks of North America

Hello, Cbna kbsa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Congress of Bosniaks of North America, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Congress of Bosniaks of North America

Hello, Cbna kbsa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Congress of Bosniaks of North America".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]