User talk:Cbfolsom122

Reply

Well, I obviously disagree with you that they "went beyond their rights", but that's my opinion. "there is nothing to prove such a thing they implied"; of course there isn't; they were expressing their personal OPINIONS, which is perfectly acceptable. Just because JM is a candidate doesn't mean people can't express their opinions about him. I highly doubt anyone would be able to bring a case over this being 'libel' (slander is spoken, libel is written) as it is clearly an expressed opinion and not a malicious statement of fact (not to mention it's a JOKE on a COMEDY show).

Anyway, did you look through the Criticism of Family Guy article? There's tons of criticisms in there. If you can find a reliable source suggesting the same thing as you (somehow I doubt you will be able to), by all means, add something to an article. Nobody's stopping you!

Finally, I'm not sure what you were implying by calling me a "well placed supporter"; you asked a question in a public place and I felt inclined to answer.

BTW:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Dp76764 (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cheers was changed by Cbfolsom122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862265 on 2011-09-07T13:07:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]