User talk:Cave Bovum

What are you looking at?

J4J and the template

Since you don't seem to be involved in the matter prior, you may be interested in knowing that the template is in fact used on many articles not just those in the "series" and the word series in the template in fact links to the general Christianity category. JoshuaZ 13:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Byrne

Please don't removed sourced content relevant to the subject matter. Thanks.--Mantanmoreland 07:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing wasn't what I found deficient. It was the lack of relevance (ie: his father's career trajectory) and the general cluttered nature (explaining short selling in addition to offering a link to same...that's why you link, to avoid restating). I also object to terms like "market-wide conspiracy." I read the transcript and he goes out of his way to not paint it as a market-wide consipiracy.

Might make more sense to move this to the article talk page. I'll meet you over there.--Beware of Cow 17:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: AFD protocol

About the notification to all interested parties - it's something that some editors do, but it is by no means expected or required. Your best bet is to keep articles you create on your watchlist, which will alert you to any changes made to the article, including a tag for AFD. I can help you through that if you have trouble with it. Sorry for not informing you of the nomination, I certainly didn't mean to go behind your back or anything like that. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mega Group members

I don't see your source for adding articles to Category:Mega Group members. It's best to include a referenced sentence in each article indicating why it belongs in a category. -Will Beback · † · 00:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]