User talk:Cavalryman/Archive 2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Cavalryman. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year Cavalryman V31!
Cavalryman V31,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 05:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Invite
Saw you created Template:British horses and nicely done as well. Inviting you to join WP:EQUINE; we've lost most of our horses in military history editors through attrition over the years and it would be nice to have folks interested in cavalry and related topics join with us! Montanabw(talk) 18:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thankyou, I've just joined. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Addition of list of battlecruisers
Be advised that I've reverted both of your recent additions of this as the list is available through the class navbox down at the bottom of the article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Thanks for all of the excellent work filling in the gaps in the template: Template:WWIRussianArms. Keep up the great work finding systematic gaps on Wikipedia! Sadads (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC) |
Welcome to MILHIST
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 09:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (.450/400 Black Powder Express) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating .450/400 Black Powder Express, Cavalryman V31!
Wikipedia editor Zppix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Great Article
To reply, leave a comment on Zppix's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warwickshire Hunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- List of hound packs of Ireland
- added a link pointing to Harrier
- List of hound packs of New Zealand
- added a link pointing to Harrier
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of hound packs of New Zealand
The article List of hound packs of New Zealand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- None of the references actually mention hound packs.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)