Jump to content

User talk:Caulde/Archive/22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: Adminship

I know, sorry about that. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well thank you for thinking of me as a great editor, but I'm sorta nervous with answering the questions and all. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my RFA

 Thank you!

Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 18:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Hanvanloon

Could you please explain the problem with username User:Hanvanloon? I understand in general the reasons for a username block but I don't see the specific problem in this case. The block log explains a COI regarding the STARS methodology but I don't understand how a COI relates to a username problem. In any event the user has chosen a new name and has requested an unblock. Thanks. Sbowers3 (talk) 18:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

Get into IRC, plz. FYI, I'm in ##RudgetKnight. Maxim(talk) 14:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Rudget. 14:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup

STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! 22:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and the top two in each pool advances. STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! 13:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That month. STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! 13:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The FAs. STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! 14:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my RFA

 Thank you!

Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 18:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Hanvanloon

Could you please explain the problem with username User:Hanvanloon? I understand in general the reasons for a username block but I don't see the specific problem in this case. The block log explains a COI regarding the STARS methodology but I don't understand how a COI relates to a username problem. In any event the user has chosen a new name and has requested an unblock. Thanks. Sbowers3 (talk) 18:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

Get into IRC, plz. FYI, I'm in ##RudgetKnight. Maxim(talk) 14:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Rudget. 14:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the rollback. I was wondering why I clicked on diff and it reverted the edit. But then I checked and you gave me rollback. So you were going to give me it before?--RyRy5 talk 16:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
A small token for giving me,RyRy5, the rollback feature when my request was only up for 10 minutes and for already considering me to have rollback. Thanks alot!--RyRy5 talk 16:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your very welcome. The rollback can be very useful to me in my RC patrol. I already made 2200+ edits in only 1 month and 3 days. Now, that can really improve. Thanks again.--RyRy5 talk 16:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine of Aragon/Katherine of Aragon

Thanks for trying to protect this article-- since the redirect, what are you going to do? (Don't want to bollox the article history because of a zealous newbie that's already been blocked once. Cheers --Yamara ✉

Hi again. If it were as simple as "K over C" then I'd be happy to leave it at that. But both are verifiable and correct-- one is the popular, one the historical/scholarly. This is a verifiable recipe for constant, pointless edit wars. Please see rpp page... --Yamara ✉ 19:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait.. huh?

Hey man, nobody told me you were back. I know it's a bit late, but welcome back! --Sharkface217 00:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Hertfordshire

Could you do me a big favour by finishing off the table, then I'll go through and add the citation sheet links and fill in the blanks in the lead. It might be ready for FLC tomorrow. I'm on IRC (#Wikipedia-en) if you need to speak. Thanks, Qst (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should be able to finish it today. Rudget. 12:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wait there, please don't initiate the featured list candidate yet. I need to do one more thing to the list first. Qst (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead :D Rudget. 14:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've got to run for a while now, unfortunately. By the way, who's nominating it? Me or you? Qst (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, I don't mind. What were you thinking of adding? Rudget. 14:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then. I'll write out a brief nomination statement now. Oh, and I've completely forgot what I was going to add, but if it comes back to me - I'll sort it out. :) Qst (talk) 15:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, the list is ready for transclusion. Just say when you're ready, and either you or I will transclude. Qst (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You may aswell transclude, after all, you wrote it. Rudget. 16:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I sent you a few messages on IRC regarding the list, then realised you'd been offline for over 40 minutes, the silly IRC client didn't tell me when I was messaging you. :) Qst (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

harrasser of Toddst1 (talk · contribs)

Fattiesshoulddie (talk · contribs) is now Monkeyballs200 (talk · contribs). Track IP? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like he has been blocked. Rudget. 16:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Great Offices of State}}

Thanks for protecting {{Great Offices of State}}. However, Electrobe's edit is still in place and needs to be reverted. Also, the {{pp-dispute}} is visible on pages it's attached to. Thanks. --Philip Stevens (talk) 17:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Has it been fixed? Rudget. 17:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite, you need to put <noinclude></noinclude> round Category:United Kingdom politics and government navigational boxes otherwise the pages the template is on are added to the category. --Philip Stevens (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for that. Rudget. 17:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Much better, thank you. --Philip Stevens (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hanvanloon

I ask that you unblock User: Hanvanloon on the basis of WP:BITE and WP:AGF. He has made useful contributions to several articles in the Quality management area, which apparently is his specialty. As a beginner, he has made mistakes but I've been working to teach him our way of doing things. I think the right way to handle him is with careful explanations, then possibly warnings, if necessary escalating blocks. Starting out with an indef block without any user talk page warnings, and without first trying short blocks, seems excessive. I'm confused, and he no doubt was confused, by "username" as the block reason. That apparently is not the reason, COI is the real reason. But COI is not a prohibition and not a reason for an indef block. Sbowers3 (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI is an integral part of the {{uw-ublock}} (username) block. If a company comes here to promote their work, they are clearly a single-purpose account, and therefore blockable. This is reflected in the two unblock reasons on the respective talk page. If you wish to state this case at WP:ANI, you are welcome to do so. Rudget. 18:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also like to point out that all username blocks are for an indefinite period of time. Rudget. 18:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding SPA, consider his major expansion to ISO 15504. He didn't mention STARS at all. He came to that article not to promote his work, but to improve the encyclopedia. His edits to Quality management and PDCA added substantial material that was totally unrelated to STARS. It seems to me that his purpose was to improve the articles, and he thought that mentioning STARS would help do that - not that adding STARS was his purpose.
I understand that a username block is indefinite until the user changes name. In this case, his name is not a problem - it's his own name, not a company name - and he is prepared to change name. That would ordinarily lead automatically to an unblock. What action by this user would lead to an unblock? Sbowers3 (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest bringing this to ANI, I don't know whether to unblock on the grounds of good contributions or keep the same for quoting himself in references. Further input is needed. Rudget. 19:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GTA IV Protection

Thank you so much for Semi-Protecting the GTA IV article! :´) I was about to have a breakdown! Emil Kastberg (talk) 20:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

I started this once before. Not sure if I'm ready to dig in (e.g. find diffs, etc.) to try to promote myself in that way again. But it would certainly be easier for vandal-fighting. Any thoughts would be appreciated. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be with you in about half an hour. Tied up with a list at the moment. :) Rudget. 14:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reason #1) Life happens. IRL stuff (work, home) was interfering with my effectiveness in my extracurricular online life, so I had to trim it back; #2) the comments here I never addressed, due in part to #1. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather get it done. Postponement is a definition of my life I'd like to shed. ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
...sounds like a logical procedure... - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can call me Tony... Anthony only if I'm trouble. ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Transcluding... oh sure, use words I don't know the meaning of right away and make me look dumb. :P - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why, what's wrong with that? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Has it been transcluded yet? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know the code for it or where it goes... exactly... - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
<Wow, really deep... Um, yes, I would appreciate that. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is it appropriate for me to inform selected administrators of this RfA, or just to let it go by random passersby? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What does this mean? What's wrong with question 10? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I caught that. ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting to note that the disagreement on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen King (soccer) has garnered support, where I took issue with the opposition that was based on that same discussion. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ADCO

αѕєηιηє t/c has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I did Stage 3! :) αѕєηιηє t/c 06:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some more questions. :) Rudget. 16:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withington

Nice work here! Looks great! I hadn't noticed you'd been expanding the page. Looks like a new forthcoming GA from you??? --Jza84 |  Talk  14:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you're really keen on going for it, I'd be more than willing to help out!... I'll have a flick through a couple of my books for Withington factoids if that helps. Would be great to squeeze out a new GA between us! --Jza84 |  Talk  14:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very much so. It's been a while now since I've done any article work, so I want to get stuck in. Rudget. 14:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'd welcome your input on main article space, especially one that is WP:GM related!
I've had a look in my three main pan-Greater Manchester books, but sadly, Withington doesn't get a mention, which is a shame. I'll see where-else I can help. Is there anything in particular that you think needs work? You may or may not be aware that all photos in this photo set have been released to a licence compatable with WikiCommons :-) --Jza84 |  Talk  15:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Goody! That'll be a great aid. Maybe Withington isn't notable enough :) Rudget. 15:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I only know the place "fleetingly", so I must admit my knowledge is limited. I always assumed Withington was more akin to industrial Chorlton-on-Medlock than suburban Didsbury, though it appears I've learnt my fact of the day with that one. I'll try to expand the page where I can. Keep me in the loop. --Jza84 |  Talk  15:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. Chorlton-on-Medlock, is that near Gorton? Rudget. 15:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC/Malleus Fatuarum

I noticed you were in the process of adding your view to Malleus Fatuarum's Request for Comment, but decided to withdraw. Please feel free to add your view to the RfC. Any contribution to this process is welcome. — scetoaux (T/C) 14:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Wales

Sorry you withdrew the WP:FPORTC. I think the recommendations brought up in the discussion will help the portal and make it better in the long run - let me know if you would like any help working on it between now and the next FPORTC discussion. Cirt (talk) 20:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Can we reduce it down to semi? All of the accounts were created today. - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

checkY No protection now. Rudget. 17:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Hi Rudget! If you don't remember me from before, you gave me rollback rights. I was just wondering if you liked baseball. Do you?--RyRy5 talk 17:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, not especially. I'm not American in so many words :) Rudget. 17:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dmcm2008

Hello Rudget,

I just wondered if you felt that I ought to seek some kind of early-stage formal mediation or other kind of input regarding User:Dmcm2008, a contributor whom I've had a content dispute with which ended in a consensus in my favour (for want of a better phrase). I've tried to bring the best out of this user during and since our dispute but have continued to face some, well, "challenging" conduct from him.

I'm not asking from intervention (or input) from yourself (or anyone else), but I'm mindful that I think I've exhausted most recommendations made by the various policies and guidelines such as outlining that I have the article's best interests at heart, suggesting a compromise, and requesting third opinions. I have no interests in making things unpleasant for Dmcm2008 but I am alarmed by recent comment from him that attest he is unlikely to amend our relationship.

I think the various threads at User_talk:Dmcm2008 (complimented by User_talk:Jza84#Whiston) coupled with his contributions give the best portrayal of where we're both upto. Do you have any thoughts/suggestions on where I ought to take this? I'm coming to you specifically as someone who is a) an entrusted and respected administrator and b) someone with more experience than myself with this kind of thing. A response is not mandatory (of course) but most welcomed! --Jza84 |  Talk  18:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be giving one tomorrow. :) Rudget. 18:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --Jza84 |  Talk  00:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Due to a futher bout of incivility, I had actually posted a noticed at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#User:Dmcm2008 to obtain feedback on this user. I have offered an olive branch to him/her in the past but it was not effective (obviously).
I should add I wasn't notified about edit warring, but for a reason. I did go upto 3 reverts only once a consensus at a central talk page had been formed against his/her point of view, in which case I thought it was fair as the discussion had closed with WP:SNOW. I do however greatly appreciate your input Rudget! It would be a shame to loose this user, as we really need someone with enthusiasm for Liverpool to start raising the standard. I hope this input has an effect and we can get this user on board. Thanks again, --Jza84 |  Talk  13:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I hope this is where the line can be drawn. Rudget. 13:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail

:) Spebi (talk) 05:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Replied. Rudget. 16:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A sock

Hi, I noticed that you were the one that blocked MJD86 (talk · contribs) for sockpuppetry. I believe another sock has popped up: TodayIAmAClown (talk · contribs), who added the same thing to an article that previous MJD socks tried to add. -- Scorpion0422 18:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Blocked indef. Rudget. 12:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the swift responce

Thanks for granting my request at WP:RFR. And even more thanks for the speed at which it was granted :) Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 12:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) Rudget. 12:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

regarding your message to me. I am not trying to 'edit war', forgive me I do not know others 'edit war' with me. As whenever I seem to edit for the purpose of enhancing an article or correcting something, as in Falkner Square, I am challenged by either Jza84 or Kitchen Knife. Jza84 is very experienced when it comes to telling you the WP rules and I am fed up with this; I had tried to be a good editor --- a new learning editor ---- but I find these two want to challenge the majority of my edits. As one backs the other up it is also perceived that I am outnumbered. Personal attacks on Jza84 are because the user needs to stop being so silly with his action. I have to argue with an outside of Liverpool over areas I have 'knowledge on' when I am not able to provide a reference. It means when I see something as wrong or put something I believe is correct, based on my knowledge, these two users work against me. No matter what I say I am being 'bullied' for want of a better word. Which I will leave these two users to do their bullying to someone else, I have no interest..I will keep an eye on WP articles but there is no point getting too involved with those two around. Dmcm2008 (talk) 13:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC) I had tried to work on wikipedia but got harrassed by those two editors at different times. I worked on the Vauxhall,Liverpool article from almost scratch, and got praise and help from Snowy. Sadly other edits I made had been targeted by the above. As all I wanted to do was expand or correct items-but Jza84 in particluar reverted them and began to sprout WP rules. That is his way not mine, I only wanted to do simple edits he took it too far particularly my judgement on Liverpools suburbs--AS did KK. Dmcm2008 (talk) 14:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: my last comment

You've set up your Werdnabot to archive within 24 hours, so perhaps you missed my last comment, but I was wondering how to proceed with the WikiProject report. Are there some standard questions I can put to the WikiProject? JACOPLANE • 2008-03-16 23:01

Re: Your deletions

Import my monobook and you'll see three tabs at the top of most pages - "di/b" empties a page or category of its images, "di/t" traverses through image categories at high speed, and "dp/b" will delete all pages linked from the page you're visiting. east.718 at 19:43, March 17, 2008

What?!

WikiProject Video games report

Hi Rudget, I haven't got time right now to work on the report, but I've pointed WT:VG to the preliminary report page. If you want some feedback on the questions you used, please ask there: all people who are involved in the project monitor that page and most people there know each other well. I'll be able to take some time to respond to your questions after tomorrow, I'm currently celebrating Easter with my family, so I have little time for Wikipedia! Take care, JACOPLANE • 2008-03-23 20:07

Atlanta

Hi Rudget. I wanted to find out why Atlanta is semi-protected. I saw that it had been badly vandalized yesterday by Dirkastan, but he's since been blocked. Is something else going on? The reason I'm asking is that it's currently a GA nominee, and semi-protection status could raise concerns during the review. Thanks, Majoreditor (talk) 18:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Apologies for that. I'll mention the mistake for the GA reviewer and hopefully that'll alay any concerns of unstability. Regards, Rudget. 14:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!! Majoreditor (talk) 14:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Tubman

Thank you for semi-protecting this page. You noted: "If it returns after the one month is finished, I'd advise asking for indefinite protection." I have requested this in the past (always denied). I'm quite sure it will be vandalized again after one month, and I will certainly request indefinite semi-protection when that happens. Thanks again. – Scartol • Tok 19:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks for being available. – Scartol • Tok 23:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OSx86 protection

Just wanted to say thanks for helping stem the tide by semi-protecting the OSx86 article, so... thanks! – ɜɿøɾɪɹℲ ( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 20:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help please

Hey, I was wondering if you can take a look at Transportation in Taiwan and find where the page has gone? It looks like it was deleted after being moved around a few times. Ta. ┌Joshii┐└chat┘ 10:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm.. Am I looking at the page moves or the history of the page before the deletion? Welcome back by the way. Rudget. 15:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User name block?

Hi, may I ask why you blocked username "RecreationalTherapy"? Thanks. (I'll watch your talk page.) Dan Beale-Cocks 15:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, sure thing. They were advertising for that very product at User:RecreationalTherapy, Recreational Therapy and User talk:RecreationalTherapy. I do note however that at least one of them has been recreated. Rudget. 15:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I feel the editor is trying to make good faith edits to improve the encyclopedia, but is unaware that WP probaly already has articles covering the subject they're interested in. I don't think they're spamming. "recreational therapy" isn't a product. Dan Beale-Cocks 15:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the deleted version of the mainspace article, it is slightly promotional and does in my opinion comply with G11 deletion, which if the article creator is under the same name consequents a username block. Looks like LeisureG8R is the new account, so lets see how that goes. He can always contribute under that name. Rudget. 15:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AIV "clerking"

Hi Rudget, I can trust you as an admin :) I'm asking your opinion. Do you think it's OK what I am doing here. I feel I'm doing fine, it's helping out (I feel) and its saving admins time. But I just wanted your thought on it. I also created a template for this use, non-admin commenting, its Template:AIV comment. Do you think thats OK? I also want to help out at WP:RFPP, you think thats possible. And I'm not an admin. If I was, I'd be blocking/protecting myself, but I'm just a lowly rollbacker. Steve Crossin (talk to me) 15:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say that's a great idea, but I don't own the community, so who knows whether it'll be accepted. I don't really see much reason why not to, but I expect some people will say that you don't need a template when you could simply comment – either way it's helpful. :) As with regards to RFPP assistance, there isn't much point unless you can express notes like whether the filer of the request has been involved in a content dispute or for example whether the article is already protected in which case you'd use {{RFPP|ap}}. Rudget. 15:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage...

...is awesome! I highly respect editors who can steal things from other editors and shamelessly post a notice on their userpage =P ! Happy editing, Malinaccier (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage...

Ashumez gd faif plz, Mr Glasgow man :) Rudget. 12:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will never AGF... cuz thiz iz SERIUS biznis! :) Anthøny 12:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does not exist? *wonders why* :) Anthøny 12:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

/me thoughtfully wonders of a lolcat *avoiding all response* :) Rudget. 12:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just don't be going all inactive and retiring on us, now ;) Anthøny 12:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to borrow/steal the formatting of my user page for yourself, even if it is a little complex. Nobody owns (intellectually, editorially or commercially) any part of any page on Wikipedia. Your current lack of userpage confused me (on my watchlist) into thinking this was somekind of bad faith imposter!... though investigation shows it is not of course. --Jza84 |  Talk  13:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

--Crazy_Anne (Eh..eh..eh) 13:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Participation in editing dispute at Jewish lobby

Since you have become involved in the editing dispute at Jewish lobby, would you like to be added to Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Jewish lobby? --John Nagle (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will be leaving my comment there shortly. Regards, Rudget. 16:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry that someone attempted to drag you in to this. Normal administrative actions do not make someone "involved" in a dispute. I requested the protection through normal channels, since I believe, as the mediator in this case, that the daily edit warring is non-productive and hindering our ability to resolve the case through proper channels. Thank you for reviewing the protection request and acting on it. Shell babelfish 17:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


New Tzatziki Squad collaboration!

Hello! I'm here to inform you that the Tzatziki Squad has begun a new collaboration, history of timekeeping devices. The goal for the article is Featured status. Please pitch in as much or as little as you can, we appreciate your help! Keilana|Parlez ici 21:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. If protection was requested by the mediator, that's fine. --John Nagle (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage... (again)

Why don't you make it redirect to the talk page? weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The User:Hanvanloon case

FYI: Update to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Hanvanloon. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 22:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks

My RfA

I can has mop?
I can has mop?
 Hi Caulde/Archive/22! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3).
I truely appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations. Thanks again!
- CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caulde/Archive/22&oldid=1096186866"