Jump to content

User talk:Catriona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Catriona! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:56, Monday, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Catriona, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
102nd Reconnaissance Battalion of General Karel Palecek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:39, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another Czech military unit article needs help

[edit]

As you have done such good work with creating 102nd Reconnaissance Battalion of General Karel Palecek I thought you might be willing to help "rescue" the article about 601st Special Forces Group, it is under threat of deletion because it has no sources. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely I will do it.. we are in the same garrison anyway. I will have a look on the sources and add them as soon as possible. Thank you for letting me know. You are awesome. Catriona (talk) 14:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sulfurboy Hi. There are the sources I added to the article. [[1]] Please could you have look at it if it is sufficient? Thank you very much. Catriona (talk) 09:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References also require inline citations, otherwise it's just an indiscriminate listing of 'sources'. We need to see that the listing actually backs up what is being said. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]