User talk:Catherinetnguyen

Hello Catherinetnguyen. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Catherinetnguyen. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Catherinetnguyen|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Melcous (talk) 08:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Catherinetnguyen (talk) 08:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If, as your user name indicates, you are an intern at the company you are writing about, you are considered by wikipedia to be an employee and you must abide by the above policies. - see WP:PAID#Meaning of "employer, client, and affiliation". Melcous (talk) 08:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also note that you created your account, waited 6 days, then made exactly 10 edits in under an hour to receive WP:AUTOCONFIRMed status, and then created this promotional article, which suggests you knew exactly what you were doing. Please abide by the policies here or you will be blocked. Melcous (talk) 08:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will abide by the policy. After I add that to my user page, do I submit my page under the articles for creation?Catherinetnguyen (talk) 08:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As the above notice says, you must add that disclosure to your user page. You are also strongly discouraged from writing about the company you work for here. If you do choose to write about them, then yes, the only thing you can do is use the WP:AFC process. You must also disclose that you are being paid there, and I would suggest that you would need to do a fair bit of work on the article to make it less promotional before submitting it, because as it stands it is likely to be rejected for that reason. Thanks Melcous (talk) 08:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EAST Films (company) (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EAST Films (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:EAST Films (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 23:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Catherinetnguyen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 23:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EAST Films

Hello, Catherinetnguyen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EAST Films".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EAST Films (company)

Hello, Catherinetnguyen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EAST Films (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]