User talk:Catboy628

This is Catboy628's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ko Tsz Pun (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ko Tsz Pun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Catboy628! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Chunky aka Al Kashmiri,

Thank you very much for your advice.

Indeed, it's really frustrating and disappointed for my article is being declined again and again😢😢, i work so hard for this, thought my writing is good... looks i need to keep learning more about how to write an article...

I had followed your advice and deleted all those un reliable sources, hope I can work out this time.

but no matter what, i appreciate your advice. Thanks again! 😊

Catboy628 Catboy628 (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ko Tsz Pun (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is currently too much unsourced information and the reliability of the sources cited are questionable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ko Tsz Pun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,InterstellarGamer12321, I just learnt how to reply here after all those months..😅Like i said to the one who first declined my article, it is very frustrating and disappointed for my article is being declined again and again😢😢, i had worked very hard for this, thought my writing is good... found out i need to keep learning about how to write an article or essay...

but no matter what, i appreciate your advice. Thanks again! 😊 Catboy628 (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and I do followed your advice and deleted the un reliable sources, hope I can work it out this time.

have a Catboy628 (talk) 03:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

have a good day is what I wanted to say! 😅 Catboy628 (talk) 03:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ko Tsz Pun (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need to be sourced, starting with the date of birth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ko Tsz Pun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ko Tsz Pun (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not sure where the claim about the subject being born on January 16 came from, since the sources only mentioned that he was 49 in 2021. If possible, add a "career" or "biography" section before "filmography", and include appropriate sources to claims about his early career and why his active years started in 1997.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ko Tsz Pun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tutwakhamoe,

I had followed your suggestion and added a "career" before filmography, i also add a reference for his date of birth. Please kindly have a look at the article see if it can be approved this time.

Thank you very much.

Catboy628 1425, 3 August 2023 Catboy628 (talk) 06:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ko Tsz Pun (November 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sources added since last decline do not demonstrate notability. Repeated declines of a BLP led to this rejection.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 03:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ko Tsz Pun has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ko Tsz Pun. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 15:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello Asilvering,

Thank you for your message,

should I resubmit it ? as much article was being rejected for so many times which made me so frustrated.. 😔😔I just don't know why they kept saying that it's not from reliable sources, it did came from reliable sources, I had the newspapers, the awards of his films, and this director is actually quite famous in Hong Kong and overseas..

i really don't know what to do more to make this right... Catboy628 (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi me again,

sorry to disturb you, may I know is that mean my article is resubmitted already? or should I do if by myself again?

i am quite fresh here, it would be appreciated if you can guide me a bit more, please.

thank you so very much. 🙏🙏😊 Catboy628 (talk) 17:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ko Tsz Pun has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ko Tsz Pun. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 00:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cabrils. Catboy628 (talk) 18:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ricky Ko has been accepted

Ricky Ko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am so glad to know that.

Thank you very much. Catboy628 (talk) 05:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 20:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]