User talk:Cataphract 40

Welcome

Hello, Cataphract 40, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --FloNight ^talk 04:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- The Anome 00:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Official policy states that wikipedia is not a slang guide -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 00:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cataphract 40: Going back in your edit history, I can see that you have been stealthily adding nonsense to Wikipedia since December of last year. An example: Dan Copeland, a version of the David Copeland article with the name changed. And so:

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Anome 00:44, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank vandalism warnings on your talk page. -- The Anome 00:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to add a page to Wikipedia is not vandalism---and I have not added any "nonsense" to Wikipedia. Dan Copeland is an alias of David Copeland. --Cataphract_40 01:42, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aoe4and5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Aoe4and5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the image in question is of a copyrighted work - and it therefore can not be uploaded as Public Domain. It doesn't matter whether you photographed, scanned, or drew the picture of this work yourself. The copyright belongs to Microsoft, not you. You'll need to use a fair-use tag and develop a fair use rationale in order to keep this image on Wikipedia. --Rklawton 00:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Canon PowerShot SX1 IS

A tag has been placed on Canon PowerShot SX1 IS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheMolecularMan (talk) 21:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Canon PowerShot SX10 IS

A tag has been placed on Canon PowerShot SX10 IS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheMolecularMan (talk) 21:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to P-39 Airacobra. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 16:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

House

Hi

Thank you for you support, but sadly I had to undo my alterations. There's a rulling against it on Wikipedia:Fiction/Noticeboard/Archive 1#List of House episodes. The user NOCTURNENOIR (who warned me about it) suggested a new votation, keep an eye on that, maybe we can convince more people that this way is better. Thanks in advance Jack O'Neill (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]