User talk:CastlevaniaWriter

Disruptive editing

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Alucard (Castlevania), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MailleWanda (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CastlevaniaWriter, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Keywaker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Alucard (Castlevania)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 01:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, a review of your editing in general suggests you might be unable to follow our guidelines in general. Your editing history shows a focus on erasing LGBT characterization across several articles. At the very least, you're done on the Alucard article without a very well done appeal. You've been at this for over 3 years. Enough. -- ferret (talk) 01:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have written several reasons for deleting the category in the Alucard page, all of which have been ignored completely by the other editor, I have followed the guidelines, but the other editor made it personal by reporting every instance as disruptive editing. I have only edited out LGBT content when the sources were clear opinion pieces rather than anything based in fact, though they're a protected class, they should not be held in a different standard when the truth is at risk. CastlevaniaWriter (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]