User talk:Caster23/archives/1

Archive one. March 2007 through September 2007

Do not Post that Reed Sorenson is engaged. This is untrue information..

My Reply - I did not 'post' that. I reverted vandalism to that page.--Caster23 04:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opps wrong talk page..Sorry.lol

TLS

FYI, in this edit, you reverted TLS a little bit too far, and undid some cleanup work I had done after the last time the "TOC, Lean, Six Sigma" stuff was added to the article. Not a huge deal, and I'll re-add my cleanups, but I wanted to let you know. —Krellis (Talk) 12:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Caster23! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 23:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops

Just reverted your revert to Kitten by mistake, my apologies! MackSalmon 19:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Know what you're talking about

Your opinion of who is and is not a suspect in the Cooper case is irrelevant. You state that the Police never interviewed Ted. The Police never interviewed anyone in the Cooper case because like all skyjackings it was handled by the FBI. Ted Mayfield's name was called in 12 times the night of the 71 jacking and he even called in himslef trying to throw off the FBI. He was named as a suspect by Inside Edition on national TV and by Ralph Himelsbach himself. Do not delete this page again. **LAST WARNING** (this was posted by 163.192.21.42 --- Caster23)

My reply Note: RfC Caster23 08:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Stewart edit

noticed you undid the one edit the one person made. They had it partially right. I had edited the win total correctly to 31, but forgot the top 10 total. 179 should be the correct number now :) Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 21:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Diamond

Hi Caster23. Since you have been improving the articles on Navistar and International Harvester, I'd like to ask you If you would know anything about the Blue Diamond agreement that's referred in Blue Diamond.. it was from there I reached those two articles, btw. I've watched them since I added the merge tag, by then. I'm glad someone who knows the subject is finally taking care of them. Waldir 18:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NASCAR

Im sorry but there is a nascar Wiki I just dont know how to put it on here. Please Help!!!!!!!!!!!! Clonetroop125

Dale Jarrett is part owner of Pay the Fan. Check out the top two latest entries of his news section of his own site: http://www.dalejarrett.com/news.asp?category=latest_news

Question

Dear Caster23,

I hope this message finds you well.

I am still kind of novice on Wiki, so could you please explain why did you delete my post and link to the Interactive NASCAR Maps while keeping the link to the essentially similar Interactive Map developed by other person (see external link titled “Interactive map of all current race tracks in North America” on the page titled “List of NASCAR race tracks”) ?

If you do not provide a reasonable explanation, then please stop deleting my posting; otherwise I would consider it as a serious violation of my equal rights as a Wiki contributor.

Kind Regards,

Alex B. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander Bell (talk • contribs) 20:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply posted here Caster23^{talk Contribs} 20:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Alex Bell

Dear Caster23,

Thanks for your quick response.

I still think that Interactive NASCAR Maps (see the links: http://www.nascaromm.com/NascarMap.aspx and http://www.nascaromm.com/NascarMapWeather.aspx have certain value added to the NASCAR page. This service is in public domain and is free to use. It definitely helps to promote and popularize NASCAR Moto-sport, which is probably one of the main goals of NASCAR page on Wiki. Plus, it also improves the overall User convenience when finding NASCAR-related Geo-facts and other local info. These Maps are developed based on the latest-greatest technology set from the Microsoft. The other one with link “permitted” on the Wiki, developed totally independently by another gentleman, utilized Google map (link: http://betona.googlepages.com/racing.html Copyright notice from his page says: "Google map marker coding © 2006 Tom Perry"). Both solutions are essentially modern sophisticated hi-tech web applications and, IMHO, they must be introduced to the NASCAR fans, probably BOTH placed in additional section called “Interactive NASCAR Maps”. After all, Wiki itself is a "Child of Internet"; then it should be more adoptive to its technological siblings.

It terms of self-promoting: any essential technological breakthrough could be interpreted as self-promoting because in many cases it could be traced to its author. Would you identify as self-promotion any reference to "telephone" or "voice communication" made by great inventor Alexander G. Bell? Probably not. Then, IMHO it should not be that bad if the reference to some new piece of web technology placed on Wiki, which definitely makes the overall User experience much better, could be somehow identified (btw, indirectly) with the name of the Author.

If you agree with me on this issue, then please restore the section mentioned above with its content. If not, then at least keep my links in the same way as you allowed it to another gentleman (RE: Google Map mentioned above).

Your comments highly invited. Kind Regards,

Alex B.

PS. NASCAR Rules! :)

Alexander Bell 21:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]