User talk:CastNames

Arbitrary cast reordering

Hi there, please don't arbitrarily reorder cast as you have done here without providing a clear, legitimate explanation for why you are making those changes. "Lead cast" as an explanation doesn't mean anything, since presumably everybody in the |starring= parameter are "stars" of the film, i.e. the lead cast. These unexplained changes tend to look like an editor is organising cast based on some personal preference for one actor over another, vs. being based on a objective ordering like the film's onscreen credits. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CastNames, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CastNames! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Reverted

TamilMirchi, remember what I told you about evading your block? How everything you do will be reverted? This path is not a good one. Once you become de facto banned, it will be unlikely you will be welcome to edit at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very disappointing

I was pretty disheartened to file that SPI report. You've just confirmed any bad impression other may have had about you as an editor on Wikipedia by evading your block, rather than deal with it honestly. Very disappointed. Ravensfire (talk) 23:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]